Discussion:
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
(too old to reply)
dolf
2018-08-26 14:37:04 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the center of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and. therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - } receives the moral predicate, and vice versa.
General propositions that exhibit such a form consequently assist us sister
in morally evaluating individual cases. If such principles are known to us,
then we would have an extremely strong means of coming to correct
valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages 7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {}, and
the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my
honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-26 14:50:13 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish} receives the
moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that exhibit such a
form consequently assist us sister in morally evaluating individual cases.
If such principles are known to us, then we would have an extremely strong
means of coming to correct valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages
7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {}, and
the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my
honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-26 15:01:15 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish} receives the
moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that exhibit such a
form consequently assist us sister in morally evaluating individual cases.
If such principles are known to us, then we would have an extremely strong
means of coming to correct valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages
7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {CAUSE AND
EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do
Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS*
*BINDING* *NORM*} / #111}, and the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? And the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour {#123 -
H3678} myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth {#123 -
H3678} me; of whom ye say, that he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45;
53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-27 00:08:30 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2018

— PELLIAN KNELL —

"DREAD IN SISYPHUS DENIAL.
OVER HEAVEN'S LAST TRIAL {#123}.
THOU DOEST
FREELY TELL.
NO CONFESSION TO COMPEL.
THE SOUNDING OF THE KNELL.
SO BEGINS DOWNW'D SPIRAL.
BY AN EVERLASTING QUELL.
TO WELCOME GATES OF
HELL."

YOUTUBE: "I Won't Back Down (Tom Petty And The Heartbreakers)"



QUELL_REBELLION@{
@1: Sup: 44 (#44); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 54 (#98); Ego: 29 (#35),
@3: Sup: 27 (#125); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 26 (#151); Ego: 13 (#51),
@5: Sup: 36 (#187); Ego: 49 (#100),
@6: Sup: 34 (#221); Ego: 73 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@7: Sup: 34 (#255); Ego: 50 (#223),
@8: Sup: 5 (#260); Ego: 70 (#293),
@9: Sup: 15 (#275); Ego: 59 (#352),
Male: #275; Feme: #352
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{275}&idea:{352}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #32 -
Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On,
Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 - Encounters / INNER: #29 -
Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light,
Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden;
Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #275 has 10 Categories:

H7287@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#134); Ego: 4 (#58),
   @5: Sup: 27 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 50 (#108),
   @6: Sup: 32 (#193); Ego: 5 (#113),
   Male: #193; Feme: #113
} // #275

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; *I* *AM* *NOT* *RAPACIOUS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
    #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
    #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
    #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
    #CANON: #102

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102

#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah (H7287): {UMBRA: #8 as #209
% #41 = #4} 1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to
scrape out; 1a) (Qal) to have dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to
cause to dominate; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out;

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let
them have dominion {#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah
(H7287): rule} over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air,
and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creepeth upon the earth." [Genesis 1:26 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #28 -
Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 -
Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full Circle / INNER: #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting}
#352 has 17 Categories: 

G3137@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
   @3: Sup: 60 (#141); Ego: 19 (#60),
   @4: Sup: 70 (#211); Ego: 10 (#70),
   @5: Sup: 71 (#282); Ego: 1 (#71),
   @6: Sup: 28 (#310); Ego: 38 (#109),
   Male: #310; Feme: #109
} // #352

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #152 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1, #200] = Maria (G3137): {UMBRA: #15 as
#152 % #41 = #29} 1) Mary the mother of Jesus; 2) Mary Magdalene, a
women from Magdala; 3) Mary, the sister of Lazarus and Martha; 4) Mary
of Cleophas the mother of James the less; 5) Mary the mother of John
Mark, a sister of Barnabas; 6) Mary, a Roman Christian who is greeted by
Paul in Rom. 16:6;

"Among which was Mary {#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1, #200] = Maria
(G3137): Mary} Magdalene, and Mary {#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1,
#200] = Maria (G3137): Mary} the mother of James and Joses, and the
mother of Zebedee's children." [Matthew 27:56 (KJV)]

G1382@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#78); Ego: 70 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 13 (#91); Ego: 20 (#94),
   @4: Sup: 23 (#114); Ego: 10 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @5: Sup: 63 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 40 (#144),
   @6: Sup: 71 (#248); Ego: 8 (#152),
   @7: Sup: 28 (#276); Ego: 38 (#190),
   Male: #276; Feme: #190
} // #352


#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] = dokime (G1382): {UMBRA: #13
as #152 % #41 = #29} 1) proving, trial; 2) approved, tried character; 3)
a proof, a specimen of tried worth;

"Whiles by the experiment {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of this ministration they glorify God for your
professed subjection unto the gospel of Christ, and for your liberal
distribution unto them, and unto all men;" [2Corinthians 9:13]

"Since ye seek a proof {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of Christ speaking in me, which to you-ward- is
not weak, but is mighty in you." [2Corinthians 13:3]

"But ye know the proof {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of him, that, as a son with the father, he hath
served with me in the gospel." [Philippians 2:22]

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles
that can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative
statements, which have a high degree of generality and therefore allow
the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369 AS #CENTRE {3x3) of GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE
(et al)

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate
criteria by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or
institutions. [Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O
#33 - GENERATION OF VIPERS, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
WRATH to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham {father of a great multitude} to our
father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up
children {#123 - H1121} unto Abraham {father of a great multitude}.”
[Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things
should or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad,
and which actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer
either a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient
criterion for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral
predicate. The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for
morality. Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by
which one “knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come
before [him], how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what
conforms to duty or is contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour
come to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following
logical form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral
quality M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object
receives a certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it
is a matter of the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate
M {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone)
/ Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that
satisfies the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish}
receives the moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that
exhibit such a form consequently assist us in morally evaluating
individual cases. If such principles are known to us, then we would have
an extremely strong means of coming to correct valuations of our
orientations in action. [Pages 7-8]

“And [JESUS {he is saved / a saviour; a deliverer} OF NAZARETH
{SOVEREIGN; one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}]
said unto them, Ye are from beneath {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: 260) ...
#34 (@7: 175) ...
#65 (@2: 34) ...
#111 (@3: 65) ...
#175 (@4: 369) ...
#260 (@8: 111) ...

#369 (@9: 15)

}; I am from above {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ...
#287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in
my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth,
and the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's {father of a great multitude} seed
{#123 - H1121}, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou,
Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever
committeth sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham {father of a great multitude}
is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's {father of a
great multitude} children, ye would do the works of Abraham {father of a
great multitude}.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham {father of a
great multitude}.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL)
profaned; 1a) pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled,
profaned (by divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary
will without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS);
Ego: 41 (#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183};
we have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
*AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"



PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
*SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
*HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
*THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
#224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
pleasing, acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
[#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
*INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
*WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
*REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
/ #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2)
to wound (fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the
flute or pipe; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself,
pollute oneself; 1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be
defiled; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2)
to violate the honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4)
to treat as common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d)
(Hiphil); 1d1) to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be
begun; 2a) (Qal) to pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound,
pierce; 2d) (Poal) to be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would *LOVE* me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"



Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 0754 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Since you want to babble, go find yourself a rubber room, you fucking
ass-clown."

<https://www.nbn.org.il/aliyahpedia/community-housing-aliyahpedia/community-profiles/bar-yochai/>

"AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
*TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.

THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
*FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF?  THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
#75 - *FAILURE*}." [Romans 2:19-21 (KJV)]

51 25 74 (#150)
73 50 27 (#150)
26 75 48 (#149 AS A LOGICAL FALLACY IN IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 /
#73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO NINE: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU
(#400) [+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}

49   9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}





<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

ORIGIN:
The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
-centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
English centre.

I hope that such metempirical / metaphysical as jurisprudent summary of
the unlawful and unconstitutional conduct and its association to the
LETTERS PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH by which the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL
COMMISSION has been empowered is sufficient for them to take
consideration of my assistance accorded to them."

DOLF TO FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION @ 1009 HOURS ON 18 JULY
2018: "MATERIAL DETAILS SUMMARY OVER A COMPLAINT TO THE FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AGAINST AMP'S 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT
WHICH IS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' AS PERJURY AT VCAT
ON 7 DECEMBER 2001 ASSOCIATED TO A SALARY CONTINUATION POLICY:

You would have noted on this morning’s news that since my MANDALAY SWAY
poem conveyed to yourselves that the MANDALAY BAY Hotel within Las Vegas
has now taken the extraordinary legal step of filing a legal claim
against the 1000 victims of the massacre in relation to which in the
absence of any motive I have provided a provisional hypothesis: #541 / #447.


That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to become aware
that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim and the
extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their representations
being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I had 4 x 5
minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 - ANTHROPIC
PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 - 11
SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
Courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented
and as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised
up; sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123
- GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."



<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The HEBREW letters as A-U-M belief systems which includes
CROWLEY, THEOSOPHY generally and FREEMASONRY are likewise capable of
being understood as ORBITAL to the PYTHAGOREAN schema]

@1 - #INR AS CHRIST #419 - SLAUGHTERS {KETHER (SUPREME CROWN - GOOD):
#99 / #297}
@5 - #CENTRE {CHOKMAH (WISDOM - BEGINNING): #111 / #333}

H7116@{
   @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
   @2: Sup: 28 (#47); Ego: 9 (#28),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#113); Ego: 38 (#66),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#189); Ego: 10 (#76),
   Male: #189; Feme: #76
} // #400

#400 as [#100, #90, #200, #10] = qatser (H7116): {#15 as #390 % #41 =
#21} 1) short, impatient; 1a) in size, number, life, strength, etc;

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 / #73 = #5 + 5x5 = #25 / #65 /
Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390 /
General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200]
as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2) *A*
*EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

H6115@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 38 (#107); Ego: 9 (#119),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#183); Ego: 38 (#157),
   Male: #183; Feme: #157
} // #400

#400 as [#40, #70, #90, #200] = `otser (H6115): {#11 as #360 % #41 =
#32} 1) restraint, coercion; 1a) restraint, coercion; 1b) barrenness (of
womb);

@6 - #15 {45} BINAH (INTELLIGENCE - END): #114 / #342
@7 - #34 {136} CHESED (LOVE AND MERCY - SOUTH): #117 / #351 - BELIAL AS
EQUIVALENT WITH FASCISM
@2 - #65 {325} GEVURAH (SEVERITY - NORTH): #102 / #306
@3 - #111 {666} TIFERET (GENEROSITY - EAST): #105 / #315
@4 - #175 {1225} NETZACH (ENDURANCE - UP): #108 / #324
@8 - #260 {2080} HOD (MAGNIFICENCE - DOWN): #120 / #360
@9 - #369 {3321} YESOD (PROCREATIVE FOUNDATION - WEST): #PSEUDO NINE:
#123 / #369
@10 - #505 {5050} MALKUTH (KINGDOM AS DWELLING OF GOD WITHIN CREATION -
EVIL): #231 / #693 - EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

YOUTUBE: “Handel's Messiah ‘Comfort Ye’ {#33 - #INR, #331 - NOT, #419 -
SLAUGHTER on YOM KIPPUR sunset of 26 September 2001; #509 - YAHAD Dead
Sea Scroll Community} and ‘Every Valley Shall Be Exalted’”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=yrOVjoAp8oc>

At verses [1:14-16], the identity of the Kittim is made unmistakable
when it states that they "*SACRIFICE* *TO* *THEIR* *STANDARDS* *AND*
*WORSHIP* *THEIR* *WEAPONS* *OF* *WAR*" {ie.



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The Chi-Rho Symbol is characterised as a *CHRISMON*]

*CHRISMON* (plural chrismons or chrisma):
- A Christogram.
- (palaeography) A stylised siglum or character interpreted as an
invocation of Christ in Merovingian and Carolingian documents. quotations
- A Christmas decoration with explicitly Christian religious symbolism.
quotations

In pre-Christian times, the Chi-Rho symbol was also to mark a
particularly valuable or relevant passage in the margin of a page,
abbreviating chrēston (good). Some coins of Ptolemy III Euergetes (r.
246–222 BC) were marked with a Chi-Rho.

Although formed of Greek characters, the device (or its separate parts)
are frequently found serving as an abbreviation in Latin text, with
endings added appropriate to a Latin noun, thus XPo, signifying Christo,
"to Christ", the dative form of Christus.

According to Lactantius, a Latin historian of North African origins
saved from poverty by the Emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337), who made
him tutor to his son Crispus, Constantine had dreamt of being ordered to
put a "heavenly divine symbol" (Latin: coeleste signum dei) on the
shields of his soldiers. The description of the actual symbol chosen by
Emperor Constantine the next morning, as reported by Lactantius, is not
very clear: it closely resembles a Chi-Rho or a staurogram, a similar
Christian symbol. That very day Constantine's army fought the forces of
Maxentius and won the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (312), outside Rome.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Rho>]

Within English scholarly usage, the meaning of chrismon (uncountable) is
mostly limited to the Chi Rho monogram. In 18th-century German usage, by
contrast, the term was expanded to include the derived cross-like sigla
not only in Merovingian {ie. Frankish dynasty founded by Clovis and
reigning in Gaul and Germany c. 500–750) and Carolingian {ie. Frankish
dynasty, founded by Charlemagne's father (Pepin III), that ruled in
western Europe from 750 to 987} times but throughout the medieval
period. English scholarly usage rarely adopts this extended usage
specifically in the context of Merovingian and Carolingian paleography.

The modern term used in American Christianity is often capitalised, as
Chrismon, and uses the plural Chrismons.
[<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/chrismon>]

“While the Pharisees {set apart} were gathered together, Jesus asked
them, 'Saying, What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he?'

They say unto him, 'The Son of David {well-beloved, dear}.'

He saith unto them, 'How then doth David {well-beloved, dear} in spirit
{ie."The LORD gave him a brilliant and discerning spirit [and] all these
he composed through prophecy given him by the Most High." [Apocryphal
Psalms of David, 11Q5 Col. 27:2-8; 11Q5 Col. 27:11]} call him Lord,
saying, 'The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I
make thine enemies thy footstool?'

If David {well-beloved, dear} then call him Lord, how is he his son {ie.
HEAVEN-EARTH-SON as *ANTHROPOCENTRIC* DYNAMIC}?'

And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from
that day forth ask him any more questions." [Matthew 22:36-46 (KJV)]

YOUTUBE: "Gaither Vocal Band - He Is Here [Live]"



"All these he composed through prophecy given him by the Most High."
[11Q5 Col. 27:11]

"AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING'S
COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME {

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {#5 as #19
*AS* *INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1)
(Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud), become Judaised

— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —

“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INR}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?

CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.

SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE {ie. BETELGEUSE} OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”

YOUTUBE: “LIFE OF BRIAN”



#486 as [#20, #1, #300, #70, #10, #20, #5, #10, #50] = katoikeo (G2730):
{#23 as #1226 % #41 = #37} 1) to dwell, settle; 2) to dwell in, inhabit;
1a) metaphor: divine powers, influences, etc., are said to dwell in his
soul, to pervade, prompt, govern it; 2a) God is said to dwell in the
temple, ie. to be always present for worshippers;

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



} JEWS {yahad-became [H3054]: #509}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE JEWS FELL UPON
THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]

DOLF TO FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION @ 0820 HOURS ON 19 JULY
2018: "VCAT TRANSCRIPT ON MATERIAL DETAILS SUMMARY OVER A COMPLAINT TO
THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AGAINST AMP'S 'UNCONSCIONABLE'
MISCONDUCT WHICH IS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' AS
PERJURY AT VCAT ON 7 DECEMBER 2001 ASSOCIATED TO A SALARY CONTINUATION
POLICY:

TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS

FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
NO: ######## FOR PLAN NO: XXXXX,XXX:

Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?

Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by

MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.

In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.

MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning, contacted the *VICTORIA* *POLICE* {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

} and reported the matter and they viewed the matter most seriously.
They suggested that I not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek,
which is why I am presenting myself by way of telephone today.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?

MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those

THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?

MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.

TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.

You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."

TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."

MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.

...

MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
from Mr

MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].

His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.

MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
planet.

Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
C-squared:

Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]

That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
that is used in...

HYPOTEÍNOUSA (verb):
- to hypothesise by ratiocination within measured bounds of division
without an incommensurate bias.

(noun):
- [GEOMETRY]: the side of a right triangle opposite the right angle.
- Also: hypothenuse.

ETYMOLOGY:
The word hypotenuse comes from Late Latin hypotēnūsa, a transliteration
of Ancient Greek ὑποτείνουσα [πλευρά] (hypoteínousa [pleurá]), meaning
"[side] subtending [the right angle]". The word was used for the
hypotenuse of a triangle c. 360 BCE by Plato in the Timaeus (dialogue)
54d and by many other ancient authors.

#1586 as [#400, #80, #70, #300, #5, #10, #50, #70, #400, #200, #1] as
'You Need Me Day And Night Gematria'

HYPOTENUSE@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
@2: Sup: 75 (#151); Ego: 80 (#156),
@3: Sup: 64 (#215); Ego: 70 (#226),
@4: Sup: 40 (#255); Ego: 57 (#283),
@5: Sup: 45 (#300); Ego: 5 (#288 - *UMBRA*), <-- *MAPPED* *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND TORAH PROTOTYPE #THREE: #96 / #288
@6: Sup: 55 (#355); Ego: 10 (#298),
@7: Sup: 24 (#379); Ego: 50 (#348),
@8: Sup: 13 (#392); Ego: 70 (#418),
@9: Sup: 8 (#400 - *TAU*); Ego: 76 (#494),
@10: Sup: 46 (#446); Ego: 38 (#532),
@11: Sup: 47 (#493); Ego: 1 (#533),
Male: #493; Feme: #533
} // #1586 <-- *UNITED* *NATIONS* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS* *COUNCIL*

A folk etymology incorrectly claims that tenuse means "side" and
hypotenuse means a support like a prop or buttress

ORIGIN: 1565–75; earlier hypotenusa < Latin hypotēnūsa < Greek
hypoteínousa (grámmē) subtending (line) (feminine present participle of
hypoteínein to subtend), equivalent to hypo- hypo- + tein- stretch (see
thin) + -ousa feminine present participle suffix

Within geometry, a hypotenuse (rarely: hypothenuse) is the longest side
of a right-angled triangle, the side opposite of the right angle. The
length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be found using the
Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the
hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two
sides. For example, if one of the other sides has a length of 3 (when
squared, 9) and the other has a length of 4 (when squared, 16), then
their squares add up to 25. The length of the hypotenuse is the square
root of 25, that is, 5.

PHILOSOPHICAL USE:
Whereas *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) is analogous to the English concepts of
being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated
as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to English as substance and
essence.

Aristotle defined protai ousiai (πρῶται οὐσίαι), "primary substances",
in the Categories as that which is neither said of nor in any subject,
eg., "this human" in particular, or "this ox". The genera in biology and
other natural kinds are substances in a secondary sense, as universals,
formally defined by the essential qualities of the primary substances;
i.e., the individual members of those kinds.

Much later, Martin Heidegger said that the original meaning of the word
*OUSIA* was lost in its translation to the Latin, and, subsequently, in
its translation to modern languages. For him, *OUSIA* means Being, not
substance, that is, not some thing or some being that "stood" (-stance)
"under" (sub-). Moreover, he also uses the binomial parousia–apousia,
denoting presence–absence, and [relativity within the] *HYPOSTASIS*
denoting existence.

THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The word *OUSIA* is not used in the New Testament except in relation to
the substance in the sense of goods twice in the parable of the Prodigal
Son where the son asked his father to divide to him his inheritance, and
then wasted it on riotous living.

An apparently related word, epiousios (affixing the prefix epi- to the
word), is used in the Lord's Prayer, but nowhere else in the scriptures.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ousia>



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion and 147,000,000+ kilometers for perihelion:
Gothika (vector image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY
SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons @
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]

YOUTUBE: "Wake Me Up (Avicii [Tim Bergling RIP: 20 April 2018])"



“BE YE NOT UNEQUALLY YOKED TOGETHER WITH UNBELIEVERS: FOR WHAT
FELLOWSHIP HATH RIGHTEOUSNESS WITH UNRIGHTEOUSNESS? AND WHAT COMMUNION
HATH LIGHT {


Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#392 / #419} / HETEROS {#395 / #461} / TORAH
{#395 / #461}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:3,col:5,nous:73&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,73}&idea:{m,392}&idea:{f,419}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

#73 as being 0600 hours / 22 June and #MEASURE {#42 - GOING TO MEET} as
conforming to the T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF
OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]

{
    'xlit' : "havvâh",
    'lingo' : 0,
    'strongs' : "H1942",
    'pronounce' : "hav-vaw'",
    'lemma' : ["הַוָּה"],
    'link' : null,
    'info' : "From הָוָא (in the sense of eagerly coveting and
*RUSHING* *UPON*; by implication, of falling); desire; also ruin;
calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty,
*NOISOME*, *PERVERSE* *THING*, substance, very wickedness.",
    'gematria' : {'16' : [5, 6, 5]},
    'umbra' : {
        '419' : [6, 2, 5, 6, 400],
        '451' : [30, 5, 6, 400, 10]
    }
}

#419 as [#6, #2, #5, #6, #400] = havvah (H1942): {#1 as #16 *AS*
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #120 / #360} 1) desire; 2)
chasm (fig. of destruction); 1a) desire (in bad sense); 2a) engulfing
ruin, destruction, calamity;

***@zen: 1, row: 3, col: 5, nous: 73 [Date: 2018.6.22, Time: 0600
hrs, Super: #392 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego:
#419 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]

} WITH DARKNESS {



Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#291 / #471} / HETEROS {#276 / #423} / TORAH {#360
/ #465}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:9,nous:67&idea:{m,67}&idea:{f,67}&idea:{m,291}&idea:{f,471}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

#67 as being 1800 hours / 22 December and #CENTRE {#1} commencement of
DAOist 103 BCE / 4 BCE designation {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days} of the
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis / ZIRAN [James 3:6] sequence:

***@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 67 [Date: 2018.12.22, Time: 1800
hrs, Super: #291 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual, Ego: #471 /
#67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread
Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]

}?” [2 Corinthians 6:11-18 (KJV)]

SEE ALSO: "WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS
#312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED
PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/1%20-%20WHAT%20IS%20A%20METAPHYSICS%20OF%20MORALS.pdf>

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI [ROYALTY3850 #312 - TERRORISM] @ 0828 HOURS ON 27
AUGUST 2018: "On this matter I agree with you.

Bar Yochai is a religious, Zionist community named after Rabbi Shimon
Bar Yochai, author of the Zohar, whose grave is located on Moshav Meron
just a few minutes from the Yishuv."

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge
to, order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to,
give command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over,
appoint; 1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to
charge, commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act);
1b) (Pual) to be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW);
Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {CAUSE
AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention
/ Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS*
*BINDING* *NORM*} / #111}, and the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried,
make firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure,
lasting; 1b1c) confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed;
1b1e) reliable, faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to
trust, to be certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust,
*BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham {father of a great multitude},
which is dead? And the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?
Jesus answered, If I honour {#123 - H3678} myself, my honour is nothing:
it is my Father that honoureth {#123 - H3678} me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat
(of *HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of
an entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham {father of a great multitude}
and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do Not Kill}, enables first and foremost
judgement {#123} of maximums. At the same time, the valuation of maxims
leads to the valuation of actions. The normative predicate which is of
ultimate concern in the valuations of actions is morality. [Page 8]

DOLF @ 0854 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2018: "COCK-A-DOODLE DOO IN FEDERAL
PARLIAMENT {FOXING BY GAUCHE BRUTALISM}

We still have more machinations and intrigues of politics to go until
they settle down in the roost.

Clearly the people need to be governed...

...rather than civil disintegration by toxicity of Social Media Networks
mobilisation becoming the democratic impetus and norm.

And one scenario is by what means can the status quo be retained without
any parties 🎉 losing credibility and vitality because of one thing you
can be assured of, there will be rigorous analysis, many words spoken,
some considerations of insinuations including perhaps invective directed
towards accountability before the roost is secure, the foxing by gauche
brutalism is gone and the squawking quelled.

YOUTUBE: “Chicken Run”



So don’t write any brutus epitaph too soon.

Know what great sin lies at your door Rupert Murdoch, what certain
judgment {#123 - *JUDGMENT*} weights against your soul and will collect
when you die off for all I care.

— CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
[Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
15 December 2017]

“OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.

DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.

YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”

<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>

*MISHPOCHA* (noun):
- Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
- Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>

30834614@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 14 (#47); Ego: 65 (#73),
@3: Sup: 77 (#124); Ego: 41 (#114),
@4: Sup: 15 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 53 (#167),
@5: Sup: 33 (#172); Ego: 15 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@6: Sup: 5 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 54 (#236),
@7: Sup: 44 (#221); Ego: 80 (#316),
@8: Sup: 51 (#272); Ego: 37 (#353),
@9: Sup: 62 (#334); Ego: 24 (#377),
@10: Sup: 8 (#342); Ego: 58 (#435),
@11: Sup: 40 (#382); Ego: 70 (#505),
@12: Sup: 60 (#442); Ego: 38 (#543),
@13: Sup: 48 (#490); Ego: 44 (#587),
Male: #490; Feme: #587
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{490}&idea:{587}>

RHONI A PETRA GAGAN @ 0940 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "Damn right, bro."

DOLF @ 1006 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "OUR KINETIC INTENTION IS TO
GENERATE #312 - ICONOCLASM BY SUBTLE NEURAL LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING AS
MEANS OF OSMOSIS WHICH BY THE PROCESS OF METASTASIS WILL EVENTUALLY JAR
THE TECTONIC PLATES TO THIER IMMUTABLE *NEO*-*NAZI* AS ROMAN CATHOLIC
IGNORANCE AND THEN SUBJECT THEM TO A CATATONIC STATE OF EXISTENCE AND
IMPOTENT BEING SO THAT THEY HAVE A DISRUPTIVE PROCREATIONAL IMPETUS ...

H6565@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 34 (#99); Ego: 80 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 72 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#153),
@5: Sup: 11 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 20 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 51 (#233); Ego: 40 (#213),
Male: #233; Feme: #213
} // #375

#375 as [#30, #5, #80, #200, #20, #40] = parar (H6565): {UMBRA: #6 as
#480 % #41 = #29} 1) to break, frustrate; 2) to split, divide; 1a)
(Hiphil); 1a1) to break, violate; 1a2) to frustrate, make ineffectual;
1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be frustrated; 1b2) to be broken; 1b3) to break;
1c) (Pilpel) to break to bits, shatter; 2a) (Qal) to split, crack
through; 2b) (Poel) to break apart; 2c) (Hithpoel) to be split, be
cracked through;

Winston Churchill said it best [and I paraphrase]: “We will never
surrender to that Vatican City-State.”

YOUTUBE: “Michael Jackson - They Don’t Care About Us (Brazil Version)”



WHAT DO ENGLISH-KNOWING PEOPLE MAKE OF THE TERM "SPACETIME"?

YOUTUBE: “The Army of Ghosts (DOCTOR WHO)”



H3742@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#80); Ego: 20 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 38 (#88),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#100); Ego: 6 (#94),
   @5: Sup: 15 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 2 (#96),
   @6: Sup: 25 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#106),
   @7: Sup: 65 (#205); Ego: 40 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   Male: #205; Feme: #146
} // #308

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #228 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

    #VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
    #TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
    #POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
    #TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
    #CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
   @1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
   @2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
   @4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
   Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#308 as [#30, #20, #200, #6, #2, #10, #40] = keruwb (H3742): {UMBRA: #9
as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) cherub, cherubim (pl); 1a) an angelic being;
1a1) as guardians of Eden; 1a2) as flanking God's throne; 1a3) as an
image form hovering over the Ark of the Covenant; 1a4) *AS* *THE*
*CHARIOT* *OF* *JEHOVAH* (*FIGURATIVE*);

Since according to our relatively of HYPERSPACE there are seven days as
a sacred principal can we not then view the continuum of spacetime as a
septet dimensional space?

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days.

*CAN* *THIS* *’OTH* *CYCLE* *OF* #312 - *TERROR* BE ALSO REGARDED AS A
COSMOGONIC PULSE TO THEN BE TARGETED FOR SYSTEMATIC ELIMINATION AND
NEUTRALISED?

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #4 - Using
Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws,
Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering / INNER: #39 - Achieving
Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great
Exceeding, Preponderance of the great, Great surpassing, Critical mass;
Tetra: 76 - Aggravation} #490 has 19 Categories: 

G4649@{
   @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#96); Ego: 20 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 47 (#143); Ego: 70 (#128),
   @4: Sup: 46 (#189); Ego: 80 (#208),
   @5: Sup: 35 (#224); Ego: 70 (#278),
   @6: Sup: 4 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 50 (#328),
   Male: #228; Feme: #328
} // #490

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

    #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
    #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
    #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
    #CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
   @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
   @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
   @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
   @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#490 as [#200, #20, #70, #80, #70, #50] = skopos (G4649): {UMBRA: #18 as
#640 % #41 = #25} 1) an observer, a watchman; 2) the distant mark looked
at, the goal or end one has in view;

I press toward the mark {#490 as [#200, #20, #70, #80, #70, #50] =
skopos (G4649): mark} for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ
Jesus." [Philippians 3:14 (KJV)]

G2554@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
   @3: Sup: 41 (#82); Ego: 20 (#41),
   @4: Sup: 30 (#112); Ego: 70 (#111),
   @5: Sup: 29 (#141); Ego: 80 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
   @6: Sup: 18 (#159); Ego: 70 (#261),
   @7: Sup: 28 (#187); Ego: 10 (#271),
   @8: Sup: 36 (#223); Ego: 8 (#279),
   @9: Sup: 74 (#297); Ego: 38 (#317),
   @10: Sup: 75 (#372); Ego: 1 (#318),
   @11: Sup: 4 (#376); Ego: 10 (#328),
   Male: #376; Feme: #328
} // #490

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1076 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?;
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net;
Tetra: 41 - Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.

    #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
    #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
    #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
    #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
    #CANON: #86

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_86@{
   @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
   @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 9 (#69),
   @4: Sup: 5 (#144); Ego: 17 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   Male: #144; Feme: #86
} // #86

#490 as [#20, #1, #20, #70, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] =
kakopoieo (G2554): {UMBRA: #12 as #1076 % #41 = #10} 1) to do harm; 2)
to do evil, do wrong;

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that
doeth good is of God: but he that doeth {#490 as [#20, #1, #20, #70,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] = kakopoieo (G2554): do} evil {#490 as
[#20, #1, #20, #70, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] = kakopoieo
(G2554): do} hath not seen God." [3John 1:11 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #20 - Left
without Language, Different From the Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 - Vastness/Wasting / INNER: #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back} #587 has 31 Categories: 

H7218@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#167); Ego: 1 (#69),
   @4: Sup: 45 (#212); Ego: 57 (#126),
   @5: Sup: 14 (#226); Ego: 50 (#176),
   @6: Sup: 20 (#246); Ego: 6 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
   Male: #246; Feme: #182
} // #587

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #587 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
    #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
    #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
    #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
    #CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
   @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
   @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
   @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#587 as [#30, #200, #1, #300, #50, #6] = ro'sh (H7218): {UMBRA: #11 as
#587 % #41 = #13} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, beginning; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city,
*NATION*, *PLACE*, *FAMILY*, priest); 1e) head, front, beginning; 1f)
chief, choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

G4374@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99),
   @3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
   @4: Sup: 45 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#207),
   @5: Sup: 53 (#203); Ego: 8 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
   @6: Sup: 22 (#225); Ego: 50 (#265),
   @7: Sup: 27 (#252); Ego: 5 (#270),
   @8: Sup: 30 (#282); Ego: 3 (#273),
   @9: Sup: 50 (#332); Ego: 20 (#293),
   @10: Sup: 51 (#383); Ego: 1 (#294),
   @11: Sup: 20 (#403); Ego: 50 (#344),
   Male: #403; Feme: #344
} // #587

#587 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #8, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #50] =
prosphero (G4374): {UMBRA: #23 as #587 % #41 = #13} 1) *TO* *BRING*
*TO*, *LEAD* *TO*; 2) to be borne towards one, to attack, assail; 1a)
one to a person who can heal him or is ready to show him some kindness,
one to a person who is to judge him; 1b) to bring a present or a thing,
to reach or hand a thing to one; 1c) to put to; 2a) to behave one's self
towards one, deal with one;

NICK O'MALLEY (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 0001 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"RUDD SAVAGES ABBOTT AND MURDOCH FOR WRECKING AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRACY:

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd has launched an incendiary attack on
Tony Abbott and News Corporation executive chairman Rupert Murdoch, who
he claims have undermined Australian democracy and contributed to the
"*ORGY* *OF* *POLITICAL* *VIOLENCE*" that led to Malcolm Turnbull's ousting.

In an opinion piece written for Fairfax Media on Monday, Mr Rudd writes
that Australian politics has become toxic and unstable due to an
obsession with opinion {ie. *SPUD*: *CONSTIPATED* *TURD* 💩 *OPINION*
*BY* *SELF*-*ENTITLEMENT* *OF* *A* *GRUNT*; #PutYourPotatosOut #auspol}
polls and the juvenile culture of a "*YOUNG*-*LABOR*/*YOUNG*-*LIBERAL*
*GENERATION* *OF* *CHILD* *POLITICIANS*".

*SPUD* (noun):
A particularly ineffective person, thing or action. Usually in the
sporting arena but can be used for a variety of professions. [Urban
Dictionary: 22 July 2009]

A person of lesser intelligence who often deems feats of numskull,
clandestine and neanderthal behaviours are more valuable to the propagation
of humanity than common sense. Usually found with shaven heads and brags
of "this one time" stories. [Urban Dictionary: 27 April 2015]

<https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Spuds&amp=true&page=2>

But Mr Rudd, who was prime minister from December 2007 to June 2010 and
again from June to September 2013, argues that the most destructive
forces upon politics have been the "unique negativity, toxicity and
hatred" of Tony Abbott as well as Mr Murdoch, who he describes as the
"*GREATEST* *CANCER* *ON* *THE* *AUSTRALIAN* *DEMOCRACY*".

Mr Rudd's prime ministership coincided with the beginning of a period of
unprecedented political bloodletting on both sides of politics.
Australia has changed PM seven times since the Howard government. The
Liberal Party's decision to dump Mr Turnbull last week has sparked a
debate over the role of conservative media in politics.

"[Mr] Abbott has never cared about policy," Mr Rudd writes. "He has only
cared about politics and winning at any cost. I cannot remember a single
positive policy initiative that Abbott has championed and then implemented.

"As a result, unconstrained by policy, the entire energies of this giant
wrecking ball of Australian politics has been focussed on destroying his
opponents."

Mr Rudd courted News Corp editors during his time in politics and was
the godfather to the son of Chris Mitchell, former editor-in-chief of
The Australian. However, he is particularly critical about News Corp's
journalism in the op ed piece.

According to Mr Rudd, Mr Murdoch does not run a news organisation, but
instead, "operates as a political party, acting in pursuit of clearly
defined commercial interests, in addition to his far-right ideological
world view".

In the UK, Murdoch made Brexit possible because of the position taken by
his papers. In the US, Murdoch's Fox News is the political echo chamber
of the far-right which enabled the Tea Party and then the Trump party to
stage a hostile take-over of the Republican Party. In Australia, as in
America, Murdoch has campaigned for decades in support of tax cuts for
the wealthy, killing action on climate change and destroying anything
approximating multiculturalism.

A spokeswoman for News Corp declined to comment.

Many of Mr Turnbull's supporters in parliament believe last week's coup
was actively supported by News Corp's newspapers and some presenters on
its pay-TV station, Sky News, as well as by Ray Hadley and Alan Jones,
employed by 2GB, which is owned by Fairfax Media, publisher of this website.

Senior Liberal sources sympathetic to Mr Turnbull have told Fairfax
Media that they believe some commentators overstepped democratic
conventions during the coup and became active players, going so far as
to lobby MPs on behalf of the insurgents and maintain momentum for Peter
Dutton's forces after the first spill failed.

Channel Nine's chief political correspondent Chris Uhlmann last week
said Jones, Hadley, and "Sky after dark" presenters such as Peta
Credlin, a former chief-of-staff to Mr Abbott, were "players in the
game" to depose Mr Turnbull.

Senior Liberals close to Mr Turnbull believe Ms Credlin, Mr Jones, and
Ross Cameron, a former Liberal MP and current Sky News host, contacted
some MPs directly to criticise Mr Turnbull.

The sources in politics and media who spoke to Fairfax Media for this
story would not be named because they wanted to protect professional
relationships. [(c) 2018 FAIRFAX MEDIA, And Reproduced Due To Its
Historical Relevance and Substantial Value Added Commentary]

<https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/rudd-savages-abbott-and-murdoch-for-wrecking-australian-democracy-20180826-p4zzw8.html>

But for those whom don't know, @5 - Fifth Columnists are any group of
people who @1 - undermine a larger group from within, usually in favour
of an enemy group or nation. The activities of a fifth column can be
overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to
assist an external attack. In whatever circumstance, it is capable of
being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's
mechanism for delivery and staging which then becomes an acute and risky
precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my Intellectual
Property and thusly my reasonable objection has always been ROMAN
CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5
- substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and
usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our
Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is
circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent of 17
September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation into a nation.

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385
% #41 = #16} 1) plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet,
*DIADEM*;

"But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the
passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews
{#INR}?

Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas {son of
shame, confusion as Babylon / Babel, incongruity; confusion; mixture as
A-U-M: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE ... #260 CE
(64 meta descriptor prototypes) ... #369 CE (encapsulated use of those
prototypes to define #81 elements) as opposite to congruity and
ratiocination}. Now Barabbas was a robber {cf: #390 - ROBBERS / SAINT
ANDREWS DAY of 30 NOVEMBER: <http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.11.30>
}." [John 18:31-40 (KJV)]

G724@{
    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
    @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
    @3: Sup: 19 (#40); Ego: 80 (#100),
    @4: Sup: 20 (#60); Ego: 1 (#101),
    @5: Sup: 23 (#83); Ego: 3 (#104),
    @6: Sup: 31 (#114); Ego: 8 (#112),
    @7: Sup: 69 (#183); Ego: 38 (#150),
    Male: #183; Feme: #150
} // #393

<-- LATER INCLUSION OF 21 APRIL 2018 WHICH CONFIRMS MY INTUITION OF 31
JULY 2017 AS CAUSE TO LODGE AN APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL
SAFETY ORDER WHICH IS SUBJECT TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER
AP-18-0775 LISTED FOR HEARING ON 21 JANUARY 2019

#393 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #8, #200] = harpage (G724): {#7 as #193
% #41 = #29} 1) the act of plundering, robbery; 2) plunder spoil; 3)
pillage (properly abstract):--extortion; 4) ravening: (of a ferocious
wild animal) extremely hungry and hunting for prey; 5) spoiling

#334 as [#20, #300, #4, #10] = Chaldeans; Chaldea; astrologers; magician
{ie.  *AS* *DEMONS*, *OR* *AS* *ROBBERS*;

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 / #73 = #5 + 5x5 = #25 / #65 /
Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390 /
General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200]
as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242 % #41 = #78} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2)
*A* *EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40
- Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

However this MALFEASANCE is unlawful conduct by a public authority such
as the Victoria Police or the Returned Services League (RSL) under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: “(1) Subject to this section, *IT*
*IS* *UNLAWFUL* *FOR* *A* *PUBLIC* *AUTHORITY* *TO* *ACT* *IN* *A* *WAY*
*THAT* *IS* *INCOMPATIBLE* *WITH* *A* *HUMAN* *RIGHT* *OR*, *IN*
*MAKING* *A* *DECISION*, *TO* *FAIL* *TO* *GIVE* *PROPER*
*CONSIDERATION* *TO* *A* *RELEVANT* *HUMAN* *RIGHT*.

MALEFICENT (adjective): literary causing harm or destruction, especially
by supernatural means. - Astrology relating to the planets Saturn (#15)
and Mars (#65), traditionally considered to have an unfavourable influence.

MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act
that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing
used especially of an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the
Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

Perhaps these businesses will only be satisfied when ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE fills the gap... and what sort of economy will that be?

Drop some litter {

#235 as [#6, #20, #1, #200, #8] = orach (H734): {#0 as #209} 1) way,
path; 1a) path, road; 1b) the path, way, passing of life (fig.); 1c) way
of living (fig.); 1d) traveller, wayfarer (meton);

#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {#1 as #215} 1) to rise,
come forth, break out, arise, rise up, shine; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise;
1a2) to come out, appear;

#349 as [#40, #10, #200, #9, #10, #70, #10] = misthios (G3407): {#10 as
#539} 1) employed for hire, hired;

} like your trashy comment and a robot comes to clean it up...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

ARSEWIPE@{
@1: Sup: 64 (#64); Ego: 67 (#67),
@2: Sup: 15 (#79); Ego: 56 (#123),
@3: Sup: 1 (#80); Ego: 71 (#194),
@4: Sup: 50 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 55 (#249),
@5: Sup: 39 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 9 (#258),
@6: Sup: 3 (#172); Ego: 48 (#306),
@7: Sup: 26 (#198); Ego: 2 (#308),
@8: Sup: 48 (#246); Ego: 68 (#376),
@9: Sup: 9 (#255); Ego: 73 (#449),
Male: #255; Feme: #449
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{255}&idea:{449}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention /
INNER: #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching:
H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion} #255 has 17 Categories:

H4798@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 78 (#118); Ego: 38 (#78),
   @3: Sup: 4 (#122); Ego: 7 (#85),
   @4: Sup: 12 (#134); Ego: 8 (#93),
   Male: #134; Feme: #93
} // #255

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
    #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
    #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
    #CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#255 as [#40, #200, #7, #8] = marzeach (H4798): {UMBRA: #7 as #255 % #41
= #9} 1) cry, cry of joy, revelry; 1a) mourning cry; 1a1) perhaps, feast
cry; 1b) cry of revelry;

"For thus saith the LORD, Enter not into the house of mourning {#255 as
[#40, #200, #7, #8] = marzeach (H4798): mourning}, neither go to lament
nor bemoan them: for I have taken away my peace from this people, saith
the LORD, even lovingkindness and mercies." [Jeremiah 16:5]

H3707@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 45 (#50); Ego: 40 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 20 (#65),
   @4: Sup: 54 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 70 (#135),
   @5: Sup: 64 (#233); Ego: 10 (#145),
   @6: Sup: 43 (#276); Ego: 60 (#205),
   @7: Sup: 53 (#329); Ego: 10 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
   @8: Sup: 12 (#341); Ego: 40 (#255),
   Male: #341; Feme: #255
} // #255

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure;

THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
*LUST*.

    #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
    #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
    #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
    #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
    #CANON: #173

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
   @1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
   @3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
   @4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
   Male: #67; Feme: #173
} // #173

#255 as [#5, #40, #20, #70, #10, #60, #10, #40] = ka`ac (H3707): {UMBRA:
#4 as #150 % #41 = #27} 1) to be angry, be vexed, be indignant, be
wroth, be grieved, provoke to anger and wrath; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be
vexed, be indignant; 1a2) to be angry; 1b) (Piel) to provoke to anger;
1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to vex; 1c2) to vex, provoke to anger;

"When thou shalt beget children, and children's children, and ye shall
have remained long in the land, and shall corrupt yourselves, and make a
graven image, or the likeness of any thing, and shall do evil in the
sight of the LORD thy God, to provoke him to anger {#255 as [#5, #40,
#20, #70, #10, #60, #10, #40] = ka`ac (H3707): anger}:" [Deuteronomy
4:25 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #44 -
Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 -
Strength / INNER: #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 -
Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the great,
Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 - Aggravation} #449 has 18
Categories:

H2853@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
   @3: Sup: 19 (#36); Ego: 8 (#19),
   @4: Sup: 14 (#50); Ego: 76 (#95),
   @5: Sup: 44 (#94); Ego: 30 (#125),
   Male: #94; Feme: #125
} // #449

#449 as [#6, #5, #8, #400, #30] = chathal (H2853): {UMBRA: #5 as #438 %
#41 = #28} 1) to entwine, enwrap, be swaddled; 1a) (Pual) to be swathed,
be enwraped; 1b) (Hophal) to be swathed, be swaddled;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #438 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
   @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

"And as for thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not
cut, neither wast thou washed in water to supple thee; thou wast not
salted at all, nor swaddled {#449 as [#6, #5, #8, #400, #30] = chathal
(H2853): swaddle} at all." [Ezekiel 16:4]

G3717@{
   @1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#78); Ego: 19 (#89),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#95); Ego: 9 (#98),
   @4: Sup: 6 (#101); Ego: 70 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
   @5: Sup: 44 (#145); Ego: 38 (#206),
   Male: #145; Feme: #206
} // #449

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #449 % #41 = #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28
- Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 - Aggravation;

THOTH MEASURE: #39 - Oh thou of beautiful shoulder, who makest thine
appearance at ....; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SWOLLEN* *WITH* *PRIDE*.

    #VIRTUE: With Residence (no. #39), attaining to rank, but
    #TOOLS: With Difficulties (no. #79), meeting with demotion.
    #POSITION: With Encounters (no. #43), coming upon difficulties.
    #TIME: With Packing (no. #31), awaiting the proper time.
    #CANON: #192

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_192@{
   @1: Sup: 39 (#39); Ego: 39 (#39),
   @2: Sup: 37 (#76); Ego: 79 (#118),
   @3: Sup: 80 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 43 (#161 - I
AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   @4: Sup: 30 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 31
(#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
   Male: #186; Feme: #192
} // #192

#449 as [#70, #100, #9, #70, #200] = orthos (G3717): {UMBRA: #14 as #449
% #41 = #39} 1) straight, erect; 1a) upright; 1b) straight, not crooked;

"And make straight {#449 as [#70, #100, #9, #70, #200] = orthos (G3717):
upright} paths for your feet, lest- that which is lame be turned out of
the way; but let it rather be healed." [Hebrews 12:13 (KJV)]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-28 03:21:22 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with
them help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects
which we merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.

Let us assume in a particular situation that we have two alternatives of
action at our disposal. We must decide between action A and action B. If
we choose A, B will never exist; if we choose B, A will likewise never
exist. If we wish to judge both options of action from a moral point of
view, we can do so with recourse to our ethical principles. In that
case, we test Whether the criteria formulated in the principles will be
satisfied or not satisfied. The criteria must be applicable both to
factually existing objects as well as to merely possibly existing ones
in order to guide our valuation. Both the actual action A and the merely
possible action B fall within the range of objects covered by the
principles. This condition has consequences for their modal status.

In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an
object of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible
world. We judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That
means, however, that these principles express something not only about
the actual world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these
principles indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears
that they exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1021 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"***@CK YOU!

This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.

(horse-shit) x 3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before

Time for a break, you assclown."

DOLF @ 1114 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "RHETORICAL ARTIFICE AS REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM NOTED: ***@CK YOU

In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"

I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...

American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010

They won't have any need to reply because they recognize the plurality
of Jewish belief which includes #509 - YAHAD (mentioned in both the Old
/ New Testaments of the Bible) as proselytes is clearly conveyed as
God's elect and chosen community.

If you have a problem with that then provide a detailed and reasoned
reply beyond engaging within a *RHETORICAL* *ARTIFICE* *OF* *REDUCTIO*
*AD* *HITLERUM* as noted: ***@CK YOU and feigned habitual ignorance by a
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

If not, I forewarn you that we are building capacity to pursue you
within a court of law for irrational hatred driven by a prejudice
conveying acts of dehumanisation being crimes against humanity and
constituting a war crime which is subject to a universal jurisdiction ...

Oh Father don't forgive them because they know what they do... "

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1130 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Jeezus is the Yid ***@t thick here! Little wonder the mindless and
leaderless Goys follow the likes of you (yours)."

DOLF @ 1441 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "NOTED DEPLOYMENT OF IGNORANCE OF
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DID FASCISM:

Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM which was NOTED: ***@CK YOU

And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE

Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on
the part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other
imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an
illustration of a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would
imply that the politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly,
saying "Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are
you" would have the same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

Thus we can factually convey without prejudice that:

#1) Your having a recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) Reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) Murderous disdain {ie. #419 - SLAUGHTER upon your altar} for Bible
Students as equivalent to HITLERS’s IDEA @215 and
#4) propensity for hymenealism (marriage) by psychosexual pejoratives
re-enforcing misnomered piety which is concerned with all-quantified,
descriptive bi-conditionals.

That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from
neo-Nazi identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION
YOU ARE."

PESACH [NEFESH BAR YOCHAI] ACEMAN (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1335 HOURS ON
27 AUGUST 2018: "Please remove me from the list to which I never
subscribed."

DOLF @ 1449 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 -
YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES) AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO]
STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH* DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW
A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM:

You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.

I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say
that I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “FOR THE CHILDREN OF
THIS WORLD {#351 - BELIAL} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE
CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}." [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287
- Covert Not ... #328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD MARRY,
AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: BUT THEY WHICH SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO
OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY,
NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN THEY DIE ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE
EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD, BEING THE CHILDREN
OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.

Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
you to do so:

49215961@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}

#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT
IS UP TO US!

Chancellor Hitler was the only known figure in human history to find a
way to break the Jew monopoly on the precious metals by moneti[s]ing
Caucasian labo[u]r ... along with international barter ... and for
twelve years Germany's Jew-free Reich flourished. Of course as I am sure
you know, that didn't work out too well. Now it is up to us."

DOLF @ 1614 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT IS UP TO US TO WIPE YOUR ARSE!

You are still purveying such Hitler bullshit when incontrovertible facts
as denial have been provided to you...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80

TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN
OF THE REPUBLIC.

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”



WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "The
only thing that needs to be provided for you is an oven."

LOOSE CANNON (***@GMX-X.COMM) @ 0423 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "[flush]

Look what the executioner does to this NAZOID sub-louse!

A true keeper... esp[ecially] the part when the hangman sticks his
fingers into the NAZOID'S eyes..."

THE PEELER (***@THEREVD.INVALID) 0601 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018:
"<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick
nazi homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's [newsgroups], you
disgusting senile nazi homo swine!"

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1003 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST
2018: "Now you are on the bad side of Dolf and I think it is funny since
he is on the prowl to butt ***@ck you. You'd like that too wouldn't you
Sockman?"

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage. It does not
matter in these passages whether there actually are other such beings
as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God. For the
Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could exist,
that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must be
understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes
clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to
the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual
arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal
status which is higher than simple contingency. The connections
formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed, possible
worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against
one of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic
positional development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of
moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical
elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free
from rational concepts of perfection.

And given our elucidation at the beginning of the chapter would posit
that there might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are
structurally complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic
experience as entelechy.

However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm
on the pretence of an emancipation, since they convey the vernacular
notion of Categorical Imperative. That when provisioned with some
vMemetic characteristic such as by normative description of maxim having
substantiality or mantric opportunism are regarded as a concrete existence.

Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes
but to informally engage within a process of self education as
enlightenment and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of
*ONTIC* necessity, its delimitation by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction
Set which is implicit to the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie.
Voluntary Will) as the systemic basis for ideas initiation and
facilitation, the dialectic of language (ie. English) itself and lastly
its circumscribing of the ontological experience through the means of a
dialectic of dissertation whether as formalised theatric prosody
presented dogmatically, as arbitrary prescription or simply as opined
proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora
of opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of
savage or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there
is {ie. telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for
want of a better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual
context and from whence does consciousness cascade?

“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love
God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans
8:28 (KJV)]

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for
them that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]

"But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things,
which is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]

“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that
liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven {#0, #27, #54}, and the
things that therein are, and the earth {#0, #9, #18}, and the things
that therein are, and the sea {#0, #3, #6}, and the things which are
therein, that there should be time no longer: {#1, #2, #3}.” [Revelation
10:6 (KJV)]

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely
make at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that
is broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”



But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-28 05:39:50 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with
them help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects
which we merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.

Let us assume in a particular situation that we have two alternatives of
action at our disposal. We must decide between action A and action B. If
we choose A, B will never exist; if we choose B, A will likewise never
exist. If we wish to judge both options of action from a moral point of
view, we can do so with recourse to our ethical principles. In that
case, we test Whether the criteria formulated in the principles will be
satisfied or not satisfied. The criteria must be applicable both to
factually existing objects as well as to merely possibly existing ones
in order to guide our valuation. Both the actual action A and the merely
possible action B fall within the range of objects covered by the
principles. This condition has consequences for their modal status.

In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an
object of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible
world. We judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That
means, however, that these principles express something not only about
the actual world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these
principles indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears
that they exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

An alternative canonical approach to expressing these normative {ie.
YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals {

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the
same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a
common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

} as being compliant with the prescriptive as progressive triadic
character {ie. HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN} of ontological perspective and the
formulation of Kant's articulation of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#1 -
Formula of Universal Law; #2 - Formula of Humanity; #3 - Formula of
Autonomy} that is then expressing "a situation requiring a choice
between equally undesirable alternatives" and its modal relations, but
in terms of *DILEMMA* which contextually frame meta-dialectic syllogism
as being otherwise consistent with a jurisprudent logical syllogism:

*DILEMMA* (noun):
- A situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.
- Any difficult or perplexing situation or problem.
- [Logic]: A form of meta-dialectic syllogism *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *TEN*
*COMMANDMENTS* (*NOMOS* *COMPRISING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *TETRAD*
*ENCOMPASSING* *OUR* *NOMENCLATURE* *AND* *BASIS* *TO* *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTIS*:

#A {Major Premise},
#B {Minor Premise},
#C {Assumptive Proposition},
#D {Restatement of a Sacred / Sovereign Principle}

In which the major premise is formed of two or more hypothetical
propositions and the minor premise is a disjunctive proposition, as

'IF #A {#1 - Nature Contains Nature} THEN #B {#2 - Nature Rejoices in
its Nature};

IF #C {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} THEN #D {#4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature}.

EITHER #A OR #C.

THEREFORE, EITHER #B OR #D.'

[Origin 1515–25 CE: Late Latin from Greek dílēmma, equivalent to di +
lêmma an assumption, premise, derivative of lambánein to take {#384 =
#5, #300, #10, #3, #6, #50, #10 as nasag (H5381): 1) to reach, overtake,
take hold upon; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to overtake; 1a2) to reach, attain
to, cause to reach; 1a3) to be able to secure, reach, have enough}.

22/7 as 3W1D ...

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days:

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.

#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}

As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

#YOD = 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is the Mind of
Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +

#MEM = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran (Chinese) / COURSE-trochos
(Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +

#TAU = 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +

#ALEPH = 23 SEPTEMBER 2001 {23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1021 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"***@CK YOU!

This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.

(horse-shit) x 3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before

Time for a break, you assclown."

DOLF @ 1114 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "RHETORICAL ARTIFICE AS REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM NOTED: ***@CK YOU

In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"

I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...

American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010

They won't have any need to reply because they recognize the plurality
of Jewish belief which includes #509 - YAHAD (mentioned in both the Old
/ New Testaments of the Bible) as proselytes is clearly conveyed as
God's elect and chosen community.

If you have a problem with that, then you ought to provide a detailed
and reasoned reply beyond engaging within a *RHETORICAL* *ARTIFICE* *OF*
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* as noted: ***@CK YOU and feigned habitual
ignorance by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

If not, I forewarn you that we are building capacity to pursue you
within a court of law for irrational hatred driven by a prejudice
conveying acts of dehumanisation being crimes against humanity and
constituting a war crime which is subject to a universal jurisdiction ...

Oh Father don't forgive them because they know what they do... "

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1130 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Jeezus is the Yid ***@t thick here! Little wonder the mindless and
leaderless Goys follow the likes of you (yours)."

DOLF @ 1441 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "NOTED DEPLOYMENT OF IGNORANCE OF
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DID FASCISM:

Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM which was NOTED: ***@CK YOU

And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE

Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on
the part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other
imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an
illustration of a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would
imply that the politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly,
saying "Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are
you" would have the same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

Thus we can factually convey without prejudice that:

#1) Your having a recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) Reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) Murderous disdain {ie. #419 - SLAUGHTER upon your altar} for Bible
Students as equivalent to HITLERS’s IDEA @215 and
#4) Propensity for hymenealism (marriage) by psychosexual pejoratives
re-enforcing misnomered piety which is concerned with all-quantified,
descriptive bi-conditionals.

That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from
neo-Nazi identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION
YOU ARE."

PESACH [NEFESH BAR YOCHAI] ACEMAN (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1335 HOURS ON
27 AUGUST 2018: "Please remove me from the list to which I never
subscribed."

DOLF @ 1449 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 -
YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES) AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO]
STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH* DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW
A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM:

You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.

I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say
that I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “FOR THE CHILDREN OF
THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR
GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}." [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287
- Covet Not ... #328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351
as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297}, AND
ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH
SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION
FROM THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN
THEY DIE ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE
CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD*
[*FOR* *ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A*
*GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.

Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
you to do so:

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}

#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT
IS UP TO US!

Chancellor Hitler was the only known figure in human history to find a
way to break the Jew monopoly on the precious metals by moneti[s]ing
Caucasian labo[u]r ... along with international barter ... and for
twelve years Germany's Jew-free Reich flourished. Of course as I am sure
you know, that didn't work out too well. Now it is up to us."

DOLF @ 1614 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT IS UP TO US TO WIPE YOUR ARSE!

You are still purveying such Hitler bullshit when incontrovertible facts
as denial have been provided to you...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80

TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN
OF THE REPUBLIC.

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”

http://youtu.be/rjQtzV9IZ0Q

WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "The
only thing that needs to be provided for you is an oven."

LOOSE CANNON (***@GMX-X.COMM) @ 0423 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "[flush]

Look what the executioner does to this NAZOID sub-louse!

A true keeper... esp[ecially] the part when the hangman sticks his
fingers into the NAZOID'S eyes..."

THE PEELER (***@THEREVD.INVALID) 0601 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018:
"<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick
nazi homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's [newsgroups], you
disgusting senile nazi homo swine!"

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1003 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST
2018: "Now you are on the bad side of Dolf and I think it is funny since
he is on the prowl to butt ***@ck you. You'd like that too wouldn't you
Sockman?"

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage. It does not
matter in these passages whether there actually are other such beings
as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God. For the
Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could exist,
that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must be
understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes
clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to
the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual
arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal
status which is higher than simple contingency. The connections
formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed, possible
worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

Nicolai Hartmann distinguishes among ontology, *ONTICS*, and
metaphysics: (i) ontology concerns the categorical analysis of entities
by means of the knowledge categories able to classify them, (ii)
*ONTICS* refers to a pre-categorical and pre-objectual connection which
is best expressed in the relation to transcendent acts, and (iii)
metaphysics is that part of *ONTICS* or that part of ontology which
concerns the residue of being that cannot be *RATIONALIZED* further
according to categories. [<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontic>]

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: “of that
which is”) is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was
closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism
writes:

“I differentiate the ‘*ONTIC*’ (‘*ONTICAL*’ etc.) from the
‘ontological’. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather
than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it
(ontology), so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of
the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much
as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION
QUANTITATIVE AND CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
CIRCUMSCRIBING LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Our informal research task into determining the epistemological
principles and properties of metaphysical necessity has been completed
and we substantially convey as factual the hypothetical postulate that
the *ONTIC* premises as meta-descriptor prototypes conveying NATURAL LAW
of NORMA OBLIGANS by a circumscribing ethical construct of being / ousia
are carried by the ONTOLOGICAL experience of language as HEBREW / GREEK
lexicon being CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING defined by a trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon:

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Whilst we publish our findings so that a peer review may be undertaken
and the core definitions can be utilised for political agreements
without the need to provide any substantial narrative of concise
consensus agreement.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar’s note
above:

“The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation,
as the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of)
particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-,
and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not.”

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology
which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is *ONTIC*
referential integrity relating to the nature of references or any
allusions. And for this realisation one must have recourse to at least
a rudimentary understanding of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being
implicit within the notion of any metacognition which is “cognition
about cognition”, “thinking about thinking”, “knowing about knowing”,
becoming “aware of one’s awareness” and higher-order thinking skills.
The term comes from the root word meta, meaning “beyond”.

The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or
more informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition
as knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a
person is engaging in metacognition if he notices that they are having a
*DILEMMA* as more trouble learning #A than #B, or if it strikes them
that they should double-check #C before accepting it as factually #D.
[J. H. Flavell (1976, p. 232)]

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against
one of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic
positional development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of
moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical
elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free
from rational concepts of perfection.

And given our earlier elucidation we would provisionally posit that
there might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are
structurally complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic
experience as entelechy.

However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm
on the pretence of an emancipation, since they convey the vernacular
notion of Categorical Imperative. That when provisioned with some
vMemetic characteristic such as by normative description of maxim having
substantiality or mantric opportunism are regarded as a concrete existence.

Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes
but to informally engage within a process of self education as
enlightenment and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of
*ONTIC* necessity, its delimitation by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction
Set which is implicit to the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie.
Voluntary Will) as the systemic basis for ideas initiation and
facilitation, the dialectic of language (ie. English) itself and lastly
its circumscribing of the ontological experience through the means of a
dialectic of dissertation whether as formalised theatric prosody
presented dogmatically, as arbitrary prescription or simply as opined
proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora
of opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of
savage or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there
is {ie. telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for
want of a better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual
context and from whence does consciousness cascade?

“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love
God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans
8:28 (KJV)]

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for
them that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]

"But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things,
which is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]

“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that
liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven {#0, #27, #54}, and the
things that therein are, and the earth {#0, #9, #18}, and the things
that therein are, and the sea {#0, #3, #6}, and the things which are
therein, that there should be time no longer: {#1, #2, #3}.” [Revelation
10:6 (KJV)]

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely
make at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that
is broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”

http://youtu.be/ZN19oHTv_Vg

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 02:13:58 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"



Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}

STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND 'YOU OUGHT NOT TO
LIE'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant ascribes
the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather to the law
{ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER}
that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an indication
that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal expression {@1,
@5, @6, @7, @2, @3, @4, @8, @9} and not in the sense of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the necessity of an
action instead of
the necessity of the law foundational for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentatlon
is as follows:

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘YOU OUGHT NOT TO LIE’ IS
VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL BEINGS DID
NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECORUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 02:52:29 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}

STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY
OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an
indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1, @5, @6, @7, @2, @3, @4, @8, @9} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO*
*LIE*’ IS VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL
BEINGS DID NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT.
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"



YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"



*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SELDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECORUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 04:33:33 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY
OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an
indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1 - Nature Contains Nature, @5 - Act of Nature, @6 - Form
of Nature, @7 - Engendering Nature, @2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature,
@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature, @4 - Nature Amended in its Nature, @8 -
Transforming Nature, @9 - Autonomous Nature} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

YOUTUBE: "The Weirding Way - Dune (1984)"



In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO*
*LIE*’ IS VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL
BEINGS DID NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"

http://youtu.be/sOeJ4rmDTvg

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"

http://youtu.be/OO2PYAnxQSo

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECOROUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 08:39:55 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 - Transformative Prototype ... #369 - Reverse
Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 - Chronological Plane Mapping} of this
very dense argumentation be distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Autonomous Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. #111 - IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated)
THEORY OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves
as an indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1 - Nature Contains Nature, @5 - Act of Nature, @6 - Form
of Nature, @7 - Engendering Nature, @2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature,
@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature, @4 - Nature Amended in its Nature, @8 -
Transforming Nature, @9 - Autonomous Nature} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

YOUTUBE: "The Weirding Way - Dune (1984)"

http://youtu.be/_Twmc6jUrNw

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined [as #41 x n = *ONTIC* NECESSITY as
“NORMATIVITY” being measured / moderated categories or “PRESCRIPTIVITY”
by meta-descriptor prototype and ethical value statement by which
evaluative % (#41 x n) judgment can be made by] rational beings. In
Kant’s terms: “EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT*
*NOT* *TO* *LIE* [is normatively #41 x6 = #246 as NORMA OBLIGANS]’ IS
VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL BEINGS DID
NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"

http://youtu.be/sOeJ4rmDTvg

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"

http://youtu.be/OO2PYAnxQSo

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.

Since Kant improperly states it is an impossibility for a human being
to accomplish this by transcendent sapiential thought and I am capably
able demonstrate it's temporal congruence as coherence by a mathematical
theoretical noumenon as being an Intellectual Property by which Immanuel
Kant himself calls noumena as the proof of a valid and rational concept
attained by pure thought. And theoretically it is technically possible
by an analysis of the TELOS HIERARCHY
<http://www.grapple369.com?telos:328&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS> to then make a
rational determinations upon the contingent characteristics such as to
the nature of the implicit #328 - Transformative Prototype or
propositions on what prototype might optimally be deployed.

Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECOROUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 13:27:44 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS
WITHIN CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF
CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES

JUST SOME INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit
one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals
objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological
dignity worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not
deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW
SUM to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb
abideth stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which
revealeth the Solar Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text
corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to
me, which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing
work" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature {#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath
scorched," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of
Horus," is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh
captive, He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who
maketh himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding
Between Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in
presence of the mighty god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over
my limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru;
there will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and
barley, and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley,
and his limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in
the Garden of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come
forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also
God. For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings
could exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding
passages must be understood as methodically executed thought
experiments, which make use of the particular modal status of ethical
principles. Now it becomes clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a
comparable modal status to the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature
support counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they
also must have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency.
The connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law
governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal
status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference between laws of nature and
laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Re: — I WOULD LIKE TO FIND COHERENT SENTENCES
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were
coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of
writing and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination
and it does not override the rules of language.
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived
as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each.
Stable hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a
complex web of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only
mutual obligation but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also
needed to temper the possible ill effects of unmediated power relations.
The perfect community, therefore, was thought to be equally dependent
upon hierarchy and reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is
modelled upon the cosmos, where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the
patterns of growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A*
*BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260
VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately. This tetragram celebrates
such ideal contact, which, the Head text promises, makes the good
individual both resplendent as the sun [ie. CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE*
*FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB* / CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY
ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124 - WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO
THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the king in his sacred
audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE*
*GREAT* *HALL* *IN* *PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99,
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms
such as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN)
+ b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary
nomenclature is a formal system of naming species of living things by
giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin
grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean:
c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 -
JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant
upon its TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY
CONTACT WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in
those few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between
categorically dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND*
*DISASTER*. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe
of God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319
/ #289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as
#342 % #41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a)
literally - 'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as
#328 % #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing,
be untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign
obedience; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act
deceptively; 1c3) to cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to
cringe, feign obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 20 (#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290
% #41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order,
layer, pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300
% #41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang,
distress;

H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching:
H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43
- Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
I do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as
#360 % #41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350
% #41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what
has been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed,
finished; 2a) with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out
the contents of a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do
just as commanded, and generally involving the notion of time, to
perform the last act which completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil;
3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law,
regarding adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname
and those who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers
(naamsaanneming registers) were created to record the family names that
were adopted. These registers often assist you in your research when
moving from the civil registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the
next and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have
survived. Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and
that of his living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the
full date and place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included
the registrant’s address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the
name adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the
time, she would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed
with their children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands
were and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as
conveyed by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John
the brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The
sons of thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *IS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *NON*
*PROCREATIONAL* *CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and
do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be
revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the
LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people:
neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and
choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even
unto them will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place
and *a* *name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I*
*will* *give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not*
*be* *cut* *off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to
serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every
one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my
covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of
prayer for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor
heterosexuality as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there
would be no distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described
as “tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the
latin word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who
demonstrates exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the
male. Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only
acceptable in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman
citizen wasn't subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing
his name and family reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A
loss of legal or social standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive”
or “submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with
feminine traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the
lower class and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn
citizen took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns
who bestowed their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a
“Scultimidonus.” Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text
from the Roman Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon
ships) was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to
harsh penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported
in his journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable
by the fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex
relations with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting
their sexual authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident
related by Plutarch in his biography of Marius, illustrates the
soldier’s right to maintain his sexual integrity. In this instance, a
legionary named Trebonius was the object of sexual assaults by his
superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius was brought before a tribunal
for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and awarded a crown of bravery
for defending his masculinity and freeborn male purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship
is heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula
and mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned
in several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius
Capitolinus was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of
Marcus Claudius Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law
are still unclear. Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct
assault on homosexuality, nor penalising the general act within ancient
Rome as a crime. Instead, it was essentially a rule to police the
masculine nature of a Roman citizen by enforcing that a freeborn takes
the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term
*BINOME* as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such
guides, the fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never
develop along the lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special
insight Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more
quickly than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw
their support from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER*
*SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53
BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 -
MEASURE, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by
Michael Nylan 1993, p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF
THE DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7
aligned with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable
qualities of flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once
gentle and inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who
lulleth me to rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds
of thousands [Text corrupt.] I am the guardian of their interests,
actively working at the hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu;
twelve in the circling round, uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the
dolf
2018-08-30 14:13:42 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS WITHIN
CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF CONVENTION
FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form
is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity
worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil
communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW SUM
to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb abideth
stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which revealeth the Solar
Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to me,
which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing work"
is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
{#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath scorched,"
is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of Horus,"
is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh captive,
He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who maketh
himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding Between
Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}
[#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in presence of the mighty
god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over my
limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru; there
will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and barley,
and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley, and his
limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in the Garden
of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL* *BEINGS*”
(eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the Preface of
the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure moral
philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God.
For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could
exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must
be understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes clear
why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to the
“*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual arguments,
too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal status which is
higher than simple contingency. The connections formulated in them are also
valid in all natural law governed, possible worlds, and in this respect,
they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference
between laws of nature and laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in
the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition, contrariness,
encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the
laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of writing
and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination and it
does not override the rules of language.
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each. Stable
hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a complex web
of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only mutual obligation
but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also needed to temper the
possible ill effects of unmediated power relations. The perfect community,
therefore, was thought to be equally dependent upon hierarchy and
reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is modelled upon the cosmos,
where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of growth, while YIN
acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately.
This tetragram celebrates such ideal contact, which, the Head text
promises, makes the good individual both resplendent as the sun [ie.
CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE* *FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB*
/ CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124
- WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the
king in his sacred audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE* *GREAT* *HALL* *IN*
*PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN
BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms such
as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16
as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature is a
formal system of naming species of living things by giving each a name
composed of two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although
they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean: c²
(25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER);
Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant upon its
TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY CONTACT
WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in those
few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between categorically
dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND* *DISASTER*. [SOURCE:
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING
by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe of
God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319 /
#289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching: H21 -
Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching:
H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching
Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL NOT
FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as #342 %
#41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a) literally -
'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra:
26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I AM
NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as #328
% #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing, be
untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign obedience;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act deceptively; 1c3) to
cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to cringe, feign
obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in Memphis; I
am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 20
(#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290 %
#41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order, layer,
pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang, distress;


H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as #360 %
#41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra:
34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350 %
#41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what has
been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed, finished; 2a)
with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out the contents of
a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do just as commanded,
and generally involving the notion of time, to perform the last act which
completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil; 3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the next
and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have survived.
Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and that of his
living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the full date and
place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included the registrant’s
address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the name
adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the time, she
would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed with their
children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as conveyed
by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John the
brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The sons of
thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *AS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *PROCREATIONAL*
*CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my
salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD,
speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither
let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose
the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them
will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place and *a*
*name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I* *will*
*give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not* *be* *cut*
*off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve
him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that
keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer
for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor heterosexuality
as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there would be no
distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described as
“tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the latin
word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who demonstrates
exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the male.
Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only acceptable
in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman citizen wasn't
subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing his name and family
reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A loss of legal or social
standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive” or
“submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with feminine
traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the lower class
and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn citizen
took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns who bestowed
their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a “Scultimidonus.”
Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text from the Roman
Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon ships)
was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to harsh
penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported in his
journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable by the
fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex relations
with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting their sexual
authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident related by Plutarch
in his biography of Marius, illustrates the soldier’s right to maintain his
sexual integrity. In this instance, a legionary named Trebonius was the
object of sexual assaults by his superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius
was brought before a tribunal for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and
awarded a crown of bravery for defending his masculinity and freeborn male
purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship is
heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula and
mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned in
several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius Capitolinus
was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of Marcus Claudius
Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law are still unclear.
Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct assault on homosexuality,
nor penalising the general act within ancient Rome as a crime. Instead, it
was essentially a rule to police the masculine nature of a Roman citizen by
enforcing that a freeborn takes the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term *BINOME*
as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such guides, the
fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never develop along the
lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special insight
Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more quickly
than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw their support
from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER* *SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 - MEASURE, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7 aligned
with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable qualities of
flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once gentle and
inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who lulleth me to
rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds of
thousands I am the guardian of their interests, actively working at the
hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu; twelve in the circling round,
uniting hands, each of them with another.

But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the Hour of the overthrow of the
Sebau." [EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #64]

At the same time, *THE* *FLOW* SUGGESTS* *THE* *PASSAGE* *OF* *TIME*. When
good men come together, early errors give way to rectitude.

APPRAISAL #8: Constant illness not seen as ill:
Blame is complete, yet uncondemned.
FATHOMING #8: Chronic illness not seen as such
Means: He is unable to cure himself.

The individual's persistent evil doing is likened to a chronic illness.
The individual who has grown accustomed to *MORAL* or physical disease
forgets what health was like. No cure is possible if the individual fails
to see himself as sick. As LAO TZU advises:

One must be sick of illness
If one is to recover from illness.

APPRAISAL #9: Seeing his illness,
Magician-healers will not fail.
FATHOMING #9: Seeing the illness for what it is
Means: He can serve as his own doctor.

In contrast APPRAISAL #8, this individual does not gloss over the serious
nature of his chronic lapses. Once he has diagnosed himself correctly, he
can certainly effect a cure. Good advisers and the Confucian Classics,
after all, exist to help in the process of healing the soul."

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #50 - VASTNESS OR WASTING, again uses
the term BINOME as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of GHOST (ie.
NETHERWORLD}: "The verse demonstrate the utter uselessness or unfocussed or
misguided activity. Though an entire *DAY* has been spent in frenzied
pursuit of a goal, no obvious gain results, despite many opportunities.
Alternatively, the same lines can describe a hunter who loses himself in
the pleasure of the chase. Far better '*TO* *CONCENTRATE* THE MIND AND
UNIFY THE WILL' in a single-minded search of the WAY, since this holds out
the promise of success.

APPRAISAL #8: The great accept official posts, . .
Ghosts at the shrine cease wailing.
Some gain their blessings.
FATHOMING #8: That the great accept posts
Means: They restore what had been lost.

The main theme of the verses is clear, though the identity of “the great”
is open to question. Once good leaders take up (or, are restored to)
office, the local patron gods cease their weeping and wailing, in
expectation of renewed good rule and the reinstitution of regular
sacrifices. The common people also expect to benefit from their
administration, and so “some gain their blessings.” Both the gods above and
the people below rejoice in the ability of the truly great to restore what
had been lost.

APPRAISAL #9: Bright pearls used for birdshot.
Even if flesh by chance is struck,
It will not repay the outlay. [Literally: 'the gain, no return' takes FEI
JOU as a BINOME]

FATHOMING #9: Lustrous pearls used for shot
Means: The expense is not recouped.

Pebbles would work as well as pearls in shooting game birds. What’s more,
pebbles, when compared with pearls, are of relatively little value.
Therefore, the hunter can afford to lose a certain number of pebbles,
though he can’t afford to lose a single pearl. Once again, the reader is
urged to carefully consider which acts are truly worthwhile. The Mystery
suggests that when precious human life is to be employed, only the Way
represents a goal sufficiency great to aim for. Unfortunately, the petty
person typically pursues the vastly inferior goals of fame, fortune, and
sex." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY
OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 50 - VASTING AND WASTING, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 313-314]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #26 - ENDEAVOUR, again uses the concept
of BINOME within the context of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*: "By analogy, the
person of truth culture gives off a kind of fragrance because he is both
"REFINED AND OF SUBSTANCE" (a pun in Chines for the *BINOME* translated
"BLOSSOM AND FRUIT"). He also should be put to immediate use by his
superiors .

APPRAISAL #7: Once its fragrance is lost,
There in no place to go.
FATHOMING: Losing his fragrance
Mean: Virtue thereby fades.

Here the fragrance of self-cultivation is destroyed. The individual lacks
all sense of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*, as in APPRAISAL #1. But since the time
is later, this now matters more. Decay proceeds from the INNER CORE. Its
equally distressing to watch this is an exquisite flower or in human being.

APPRAISAL #8: Yellow Centre: he escapes calamity
Because he is properly aligned.
FATHOMING #8: Yellow Centre, avoiding calamity,
Means: He is attuned and thus upright." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 26 - ENDEAVOUR, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 209]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #42 - GOING TO MEET (which is the
*ONTIC* terminus and conforms to THOTH entering the Great Hall knowing the
#42 NAMES of the EGYPTIAN GODS], again uses the concept of BINOME within
the context of *IMMORAL* *CONDUCT* *OF* *BULLYING*: "Chinese traditions
reflect the notion of mutual interaction by *CATEGORY*, by which
transformations over time and space take place by laws of mutual sympathy,
rather than Newtonian law
of cause- and-effect.

The dragon, of course, stands for the moral superior, especially the:
*RULER*; the egg, for the less developed human being. Though both parties
seem to inhabit entirely different spheres, the moral superior miraculously
affects others, who learn by suasive influence to develop properly into
full human beings.

APPRAISAL #3: The quintessential stuff of things
Travels subtly back and forth.
Ill omens precede the quickest senses.
FATHOMING #3: The essence, all unseen, goes back and forth.
Meaning: Evil omens are proof of blame.

[Footnote: Taking CHING as the subject and WEI as the adverb 'subtly',
however others take CHING WEI as a *BINOME*, meaning 'FINEST EMANATIONS';
CHING CHIN as 'the smallest, finest part' of things that respond with
extreme sensitivity and YAO FEN as 'OMINOUS EXALTATIONS']

Since each of the myriad things is composed of numinous CH'I, in some sense
all parts of the cosmos can resonate with others because of their
underlying sympathy. The gods and spirits are only the most exquisitely
sensitive (and therefore, reactive) members of the universe since their
constitutive CH'I is particularly subtle and concentrated
(“quintessential”). By definition, the sage has acquired similar divine
powers of perception. Omen theory tells us that the gods, spirits, and
sages react immediately to the slightest *MORAL* shift on the part of other
human beings. Even such swift reactions, however, lag behind the
spontaneous,
production of portents in the cosmos. The merest inclination towards evil
on the part of those in power, for example, produces serious dislocations
in the starry heavens. In this Appraisal, dedicated to the transition from
thought to action, we are reminded that our innermost thoughts soon prompt
visible reactions. We must take special care, hen, not to depart from the
Way, lest we disorder the entire cosmic fabric.

...

Yellow as the colour assigned to the centre is usually auspicious. Here
the, the problem is that yellow mounts to the top position. (This may
refer to the increasing ascendency of YIN CH'I following the summer
solstice.) Yellow no longer knows its placer, so its characteristic virtues
of self-abnegation, *LOYALTY*, and of good faith fail utterly. Perhaps a
trusted sub-ordinate intends to usurp his superior's position for the word
'RISES' also means 'TO BULLY.' Those with great ambition make the worst
allies.

APPRAISAL #6: Black Heaven meets Yellow Earth.
Their ideas interact, one upon the other.
FATHOMING #6: Black and yellow meeting
Means: They respond by type.

Black is the colour of Heaven; yellow, that of Earth. The interaction of
these two cosmic powers is said to produce timely wind and rain, which all
the myriad things depends depend upon for life. As the CHANGES says:

HEAVEN AND EARTH COME TOGETHER, AND THE MYRIAD THING ARE TRANSFORMED IN
PRISTINE FORM. *MALE* *AND* *FEMALE* *BLEND* *THEIR* *ESSENCES*, *AND*
*THE* *MYRIAD* *THINGS* *ARE* *TRANSFORMED* *AND* *ENGENDERED* [SOURCE:
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 42 - GOING TO MEET, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN
CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 274, 275]

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/ *MALE* /FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/ *FEMALE* /MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996
/ New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ *ENUMERATE* /OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with
Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

As I sated within an earlier chapter, that an alternative canonical
approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME
are considered a BINOME as IDENTICAL TO THE PYTHAGOREAN AND LATIN BINOMIAL
NOMENCLATURE} bi-conditionals:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.
 
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-30 21:28:17 UTC
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Dubstep Gaming Music ⛔ Best Dubstep, Drum n Bass, Drumstep ✔ It's
Gaming Time"



"49J1W2D - 4. Wherefore I have ordained for thee the year-weeks and the
years and the jubilees: there are forty-nine jubilees from the days of Adam
{earthy; red} until this day, and one week and two years and there are yet
*FORTY* *YEARS* (49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J) *TO* *COME* (*LITERALLY*
“*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS* *OF* *THE* *LORD*,
*UNTIL* *THEY* *PASS* *OVER* *INTO* *THE* *LAND* *OF* *CANAAN* {merchant;
trader; or that humbles and subdues}, crossing the Jordan {the river of
judgment} to the west.”

Nous: #48
Time: 10:30 hrs
Date: 2018.8.31
Torah: [#40, #6, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 46 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 6 (#46),
@3: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 40 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #91; Feme: #86
} // #86

Dao: Forgetting Knowledge
Tetra: #20 - Advance
I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas

Latin: Revalator {God the end of all things} Alt: Mihael {The Who & What of
God} {

1. PROTECTS IN MYSTERIOUS OPERATIONS, BRINGS EVERY EXPERIENCE TO A HAPPY
CONCLUSION
2. SCIENCE OF PHYSICS & MEDICINE
3. HEALTH & LONGEVITY
4. Atembui
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#226 / #372} / HETEROS {#235 / #336} / TORAH {#235 /
#336}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:4,col:2,nous:48&idea:{m,60}&idea:{f,85}&idea:{m,226}&idea:{f,372}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 4, col: 2, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.8.31, Time: 10:30
hrs, Super: #226 / #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering,
Ego: #372 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress,
Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance]

H6175@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 76 (#82); Ego: 70 (#76),
@3: Sup: 33 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 38 (#114),
@4: Sup: 39 (#154); Ego: 6 (#120),
@5: Sup: 79 (#233); Ego: 40 (#160),
@6: Sup: 8 (#241); Ego: 10 (#170),
@7: Sup: 48 (#289); Ego: 40 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #289; Feme: #210
} // #372

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #316 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#372 as [#6, #70, #200, #6, #40, #10, #40] = `aruwm (H6175): {UMBRA: #7 as
#316 % #41 = #29} 1) subtle, shrewd, crafty, sly, sensible; 1a) crafty; 1b)
shrewd, sensible, prudent;

H7585@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 6 (#36); Ego: 57 (#87),
@3: Sup: 7 (#43); Ego: 1 (#88),
@4: Sup: 13 (#56); Ego: 6 (#94),
@5: Sup: 43 (#99); Ego: 30 (#124),
@6: Sup: 48 (#147); Ego: 5 (#129),
Male: #147; Feme: #129
} // #372

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #337 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#372 as [#30, #300, #1, #6, #30, #5] = she'owl (H7585): {UMBRA: #9 as #337
% #41 = #9} 1) sheol, *underworld*, *grave*, *hell*, pit; 1a) the
underworld; 1b) Sheol - the OT designation for the abode of the dead; 1b1)
place of no return; 1b2) without praise of God; 1b3) wicked sent there for
punishment; 1b4) righteous not abandoned to it; 1b5) of the place of exile
(fig); 1b6) of extreme degradation in sin;

H6466@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 35 (#77); Ego: 80 (#116),
@4: Sup: 24 (#101); Ego: 70 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@5: Sup: 54 (#155); Ego: 30 (#216),
@6: Sup: 64 (#219); Ego: 10 (#226),
Male: #219; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #180 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;

THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; I am not an eaves-dropper.

#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140

#226 as [#6, #30, #80, #70, #30, #10] = pa`al (H6466): {UMBRA: #9 as #180 %
#41 = #16} 1) to do, make; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to do; 1a2) to make;

G1963@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 64 (#87); Ego: 50 (#145),
@5: Sup: 53 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 70 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
@6: Sup: 63 (#203); Ego: 10 (#225),
@7: Sup: 64 (#267); Ego: 1 (#226),
Male: #267; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #226 % #41 = #21 - Guiding the Physical, Emptying the Heart;
I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining, Influence (wooing), Feelings;
Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet;

THOTH MEASURE: #21 - Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in Amu; I do not cause terrors.

#VIRTUE: Release (no. #21) means a push forward.
#TOOLS: Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline.
#POSITION: With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids.
#TIME: With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards.
#CANON: #156

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_156@{
@1: Sup: 21 (#21); Ego: 21 (#21),
@2: Sup: 1 (#22); Ego: 61 (#82),
@3: Sup: 50 (#72); Ego: 49 (#131),
@4: Sup: 75 (#147); Ego: 25 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
Male: #147; Feme: #156
} // #156

#226 as [#5, #80, #10, #50, #70, #10, #1] = epinoia (G1963): {UMBRA: #15 as
#226 % #41 = #21} 1) thought, purpose;

H6006@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 76 (#82); Ego: 70 (#76),
@3: Sup: 35 (#117); Ego: 40 (#116),
@4: Sup: 14 (#131); Ego: 60 (#176),
@5: Sup: 24 (#155); Ego: 10 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@6: Sup: 64 (#219); Ego: 40 (#226),
Male: #219; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182

#226 as [#6, #70, #40, #60, #10, #40] = `amac (H6006): {UMBRA: #6 as #170 %
#41 = #6} 1) to load, carry, carry a load; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to load; 1a2) to
carry a load; 1b) (Hiphil) to lay a load on;

H5946@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 29 (#118); Ego: 10 (#110),
@4: Sup: 35 (#153); Ego: 6 (#116),
@5: Sup: 4 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 50 (#166 - I AM NOT
SLUGGISH {%11}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#176),
@7: Sup: 64 (#235); Ego: 50 (#226),
Male: #235; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #166 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#226 as [#70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50] = `elyown (Aramaic) (H5946):
{UMBRA: #5 as #166 % #41 = #2} 1) *the* *Most* *High*; 1a) *of* *God*;

YOUTUBE: “The Rains Are Coming”


Post by dolf
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS WITHIN
CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF CONVENTION
FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form
is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals objectives {
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."
} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity
worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil
communications corrupt good manners.
Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”
The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.
O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW SUM
to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb abideth
stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which revealeth the Solar
Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to me,
which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.
"Let me be told my name," say,
1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}
2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.
#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}
3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing work"
is thy name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
{#5 - Act of Nature}}
4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}
5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.
#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.
#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature
7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.
#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature
8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.
#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature
9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature
10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath scorched,"
is thy name.
#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature
11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.
#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}
12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of Horus,"
is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature
13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh captive,
He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who maketh
himself," are your names.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding Between
Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}
14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.
#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.
#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.
#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}
[#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.
#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.
#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]
20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.
#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.
#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]
To be said before them.
Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in presence of the mighty
god.
I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.
Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over my
limbs.
I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.
If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru; there
will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and barley,
and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley, and his
limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in the Garden
of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.
The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”
Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.
Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL* *BEINGS*”
(eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the Preface of
the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure moral
philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {
}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God.
For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could
exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must
be understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes clear
why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to the
“*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual arguments,
too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal status which is
higher than simple contingency. The connections formulated in them are also
valid in all natural law governed, possible worlds, and in this respect,
they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference
between laws of nature and laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in
the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {
#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition, contrariness,
encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;
As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days
#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days
} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the
laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of writing
and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination and it
does not override the rules of language.
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."
In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each. Stable
hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a complex web
of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only mutual obligation
but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also needed to temper the
possible ill effects of unmediated power relations. The perfect community,
therefore, was thought to be equally dependent upon hierarchy and
reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is modelled upon the cosmos,
where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of growth, while YIN
acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately.
This tetragram celebrates such ideal contact, which, the Head text
promises, makes the good individual both resplendent as the sun [ie.
CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE* *FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB*
/ CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124
- WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the
king in his sacred audience hall.
"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE* *GREAT* *HALL* *IN*
*PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.
I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN
BOOK OF THE DEAD]
THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*
NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms such
as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16
as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature is a
formal system of naming species of living things by giving each a name
composed of two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although
they can be based on words from other languages
That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean: c²
(25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER);
Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant upon its
TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.
IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY CONTACT
WITH THE MYSTERY.
This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in those
few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between categorically
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING
by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]
*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*
Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55
Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite
Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe of
God} {
1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}
Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319 /
#289}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching: H21 -
Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure]
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360
H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching
Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL NOT
FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140
#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as #342 %
#41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a) literally -
'that excites shame';
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360
UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
26 - Endeavour;
THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.
#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I AM
NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158
#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as #328
% #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing, be
untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign obedience;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act deceptively; 1c3) to
cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to cringe, feign
obedience;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in Memphis; I
am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215
#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 20
(#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350
UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290 %
#41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order, layer,
pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang, distress;
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360
#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360
UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;
THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191
#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as #360 %
#41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360
UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350
#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350
34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350 %
#41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;
THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.
#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197
#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what has
been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed, finished; 2a)
with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out the contents of
a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do just as commanded,
and generally involving the notion of time, to perform the last act which
completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil; 3a) of tribute;
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the next
and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have survived.
Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and that of his
living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the full date and
place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included the registrant’s
address.
Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the name
adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the time, she
would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed with their
children and grandchildren.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as conveyed
"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John the
brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The sons of
thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]
"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *AS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *PROCREATIONAL*
*CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my
salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.
Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.
Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD,
speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither
let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.
For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose
the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them
will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place and *a*
*name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I* *will*
*give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not* *be* *cut*
*off*.
Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve
him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that
keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer
for all people.
The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]
} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor heterosexuality
as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there would be no
distinction.
Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.
In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described as
“tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the latin
word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who demonstrates
exemplary and heroic qualities.
Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the male.
Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.
Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only acceptable
in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman citizen wasn't
subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing his name and family
reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A loss of legal or social
standing).
Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive” or
“submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with feminine
traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the lower class
and slaves.
Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn citizen
took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns who bestowed
their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a “Scultimidonus.”
Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text from the Roman
Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).
In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon ships)
was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to harsh
penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported in his
journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable by the
fustuarium, (clubbing to death).
As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex relations
with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting their sexual
authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident related by Plutarch
in his biography of Marius, illustrates the soldier’s right to maintain his
sexual integrity. In this instance, a legionary named Trebonius was the
object of sexual assaults by his superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius
was brought before a tribunal for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and
awarded a crown of bravery for defending his masculinity and freeborn male
purity.
In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship is
heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula and
mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).
Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned in
several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius Capitolinus
was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of Marcus Claudius
Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law are still unclear.
Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct assault on homosexuality,
nor penalising the general act within ancient Rome as a crime. Instead, it
was essentially a rule to police the masculine nature of a Roman citizen by
enforcing that a freeborn takes the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term *BINOME*
as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such guides, the
fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never develop along the
lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.
APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]
Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special insight
Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more quickly
than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw their support
from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER* *SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.
APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 - MEASURE, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 322, 578]
He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7 aligned
with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable qualities of
flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once gentle and
inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who lulleth me to
rest is the god in Lion form.
Do thou save me!
I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.
"I know the deep waters" is my name.
I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds of
thousands I am the guardian of their interests, actively working at the
hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu; twelve in the circling round,
uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the Hour of the overthrow of the
Sebau." [EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #64]
At the same time, *THE* *FLOW* SUGGESTS* *THE* *PASSAGE* *OF* *TIME*. When
good men come together, early errors give way to rectitude.
Blame is complete, yet uncondemned.
FATHOMING #8: Chronic illness not seen as such
Means: He is unable to cure himself.
The individual's persistent evil doing is likened to a chronic illness.
The individual who has grown accustomed to *MORAL* or physical disease
forgets what health was like. No cure is possible if the individual fails
One must be sick of illness
If one is to recover from illness.
APPRAISAL #9: Seeing his illness,
Magician-healers will not fail.
FATHOMING #9: Seeing the illness for what it is
Means: He can serve as his own doctor.
In contrast APPRAISAL #8, this individual does not gloss over the serious
nature of his chronic lapses. Once he has diagnosed himself correctly, he
can certainly effect a cure. Good advisers and the Confucian Classics,
after all, exist to help in the process of healing the soul."
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #50 - VASTNESS OR WASTING, again uses
the term BINOME as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of GHOST (ie.
NETHERWORLD}: "The verse demonstrate the utter uselessness or unfocussed or
misguided activity. Though an entire *DAY* has been spent in frenzied
pursuit of a goal, no obvious gain results, despite many opportunities.
Alternatively, the same lines can describe a hunter who loses himself in
the pleasure of the chase. Far better '*TO* *CONCENTRATE* THE MIND AND
UNIFY THE WILL' in a single-minded search of the WAY, since this holds out
the promise of success.
APPRAISAL #8: The great accept official posts, . .
Ghosts at the shrine cease wailing.
Some gain their blessings.
FATHOMING #8: That the great accept posts
Means: They restore what had been lost.
The main theme of the verses is clear, though the identity of “the great”
is open to question. Once good leaders take up (or, are restored to)
office, the local patron gods cease their weeping and wailing, in
expectation of renewed good rule and the reinstitution of regular
sacrifices. The common people also expect to benefit from their
administration, and so “some gain their blessings.” Both the gods above and
the people below rejoice in the ability of the truly great to restore what
had been lost.
APPRAISAL #9: Bright pearls used for birdshot.
Even if flesh by chance is struck,
It will not repay the outlay. [Literally: 'the gain, no return' takes FEI
JOU as a BINOME]
FATHOMING #9: Lustrous pearls used for shot
Means: The expense is not recouped.
Pebbles would work as well as pearls in shooting game birds. What’s more,
pebbles, when compared with pearls, are of relatively little value.
Therefore, the hunter can afford to lose a certain number of pebbles,
though he can’t afford to lose a single pearl. Once again, the reader is
urged to carefully consider which acts are truly worthwhile. The Mystery
suggests that when precious human life is to be employed, only the Way
represents a goal sufficiency great to aim for. Unfortunately, the petty
person typically pursues the vastly inferior goals of fame, fortune, and
sex." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY
OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 50 - VASTING AND WASTING, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 313-314]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #26 - ENDEAVOUR, again uses the concept
of BINOME within the context of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*: "By analogy, the
person of truth culture gives off a kind of fragrance because he is both
"REFINED AND OF SUBSTANCE" (a pun in Chines for the *BINOME* translated
"BLOSSOM AND FRUIT"). He also should be put to immediate use by his
superiors .
APPRAISAL #7: Once its fragrance is lost,
There in no place to go.
FATHOMING: Losing his fragrance
Mean: Virtue thereby fades.
Here the fragrance of self-cultivation is destroyed. The individual lacks
all sense of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*, as in APPRAISAL #1. But since the time
is later, this now matters more. Decay proceeds from the INNER CORE. Its
equally distressing to watch this is an exquisite flower or in human being.
APPRAISAL #8: Yellow Centre: he escapes calamity
Because he is properly aligned.
FATHOMING #8: Yellow Centre, avoiding calamity,
Means: He is attuned and thus upright." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 26 - ENDEAVOUR, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 209]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #42 - GOING TO MEET (which is the
*ONTIC* terminus and conforms to THOTH entering the Great Hall knowing the
#42 NAMES of the EGYPTIAN GODS], again uses the concept of BINOME within
the context of *IMMORAL* *CONDUCT* *OF* *BULLYING*: "Chinese traditions
reflect the notion of mutual interaction by *CATEGORY*, by which
transformations over time and space take place by laws of mutual sympathy,
rather than Newtonian law
of cause- and-effect.
*RULER*; the egg, for the less developed human being. Though both parties
seem to inhabit entirely different spheres, the moral superior miraculously
affects others, who learn by suasive influence to develop properly into
full human beings.
APPRAISAL #3: The quintessential stuff of things
Travels subtly back and forth.
Ill omens precede the quickest senses.
FATHOMING #3: The essence, all unseen, goes back and forth.
Meaning: Evil omens are proof of blame.
[Footnote: Taking CHING as the subject and WEI as the adverb 'subtly',
however others take CHING WEI as a *BINOME*, meaning 'FINEST EMANATIONS';
CHING CHIN as 'the smallest, finest part' of things that respond with
extreme sensitivity and YAO FEN as 'OMINOUS EXALTATIONS']
Since each of the myriad things is composed of numinous CH'I, in some sense
all parts of the cosmos can resonate with others because of their
underlying sympathy. The gods and spirits are only the most exquisitely
sensitive (and therefore, reactive) members of the universe since their
constitutive CH'I is particularly subtle and concentrated
(“quintessential”). By definition, the sage has acquired similar divine
powers of perception. Omen theory tells us that the gods, spirits, and
sages react immediately to the slightest *MORAL* shift on the part of other
human beings. Even such swift reactions, however, lag behind the
spontaneous,
production of portents in the cosmos. The merest inclination towards evil
on the part of those in power, for example, produces serious dislocations
in the starry heavens. In this Appraisal, dedicated to the transition from
thought to action, we are reminded that our innermost thoughts soon prompt
visible reactions. We must take special care, hen, not to depart from the
Way, lest we disorder the entire cosmic fabric.
...
Yellow as the colour assigned to the centre is usually auspicious. Here
the, the problem is that yellow mounts to the top position. (This may
refer to the increasing ascendency of YIN CH'I following the summer
solstice.) Yellow no longer knows its placer, so its characteristic virtues
of self-abnegation, *LOYALTY*, and of good faith fail utterly. Perhaps a
trusted sub-ordinate intends to usurp his superior's position for the word
'RISES' also means 'TO BULLY.' Those with great ambition make the worst
allies.
APPRAISAL #6: Black Heaven meets Yellow Earth.
Their ideas interact, one upon the other.
FATHOMING #6: Black and yellow meeting
Means: They respond by type.
Black is the colour of Heaven; yellow, that of Earth. The interaction of
these two cosmic powers is said to produce timely wind and rain, which all
HEAVEN AND EARTH COME TOGETHER, AND THE MYRIAD THING ARE TRANSFORMED IN
PRISTINE FORM. *MALE* *AND* *FEMALE* *BLEND* *THEIR* *ESSENCES*, *AND*
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 42 - GOING TO MEET, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN
CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 274, 275]
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/ *MALE* /FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/ *FEMALE* /MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996
/ New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ *ENUMERATE* /OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with
Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
As I sated within an earlier chapter, that an alternative canonical
approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME
are considered a BINOME as IDENTICAL TO THE PYTHAGOREAN AND LATIN BINOMIAL
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.
 
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-30 13:39:34 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS
WITHIN CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF
CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES

On 30/8/18 7:46 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Thursday,
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of
variation as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its
grammatical form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage
is as “knit one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant
bi-conditionals objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological
dignity worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not
deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW
SUM to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb
abideth stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which
revealeth the Solar Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text
corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to
me, which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing
work" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature {#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath
scorched," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of
Horus," is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh
captive, He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who
maketh himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding
Between Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in
presence of the mighty god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over
my limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru;
there will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and
barley, and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley,
and his limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in
the Garden of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also
God. For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings
could exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding
passages must be understood as methodically executed thought
experiments, which make use of the particular modal status of ethical
principles. Now it becomes clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a
comparable modal status to the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature
support counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they
also must have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency.
The connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law
governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal
status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference between laws of nature and
laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

Re: — I WOULD LIKE TO FIND COHERENT SENTENCES
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were
coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of
writing and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination
and it does not override the rules of language.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived
as beyond
Post by dolf
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each.
Stable hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a
complex web of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only
mutual obligation but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also
needed to temper the possible ill effects of unmediated power relations.
The perfect community, therefore, was thought to be equally dependent
upon hierarchy and reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is
modelled upon the cosmos, where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the
patterns of growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A*
*BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260
VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately. This tetragram celebrates
such ideal contact, which, the Head text promises, makes the good
individual both resplendent as the sun [ie. CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE*
*FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB* / CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY
ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124 - WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO
THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the king in his sacred
audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE*
*GREAT* *HALL* *IN* *PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99,
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms
such as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN)
+ b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary
nomenclature is a formal system of naming species of living things by
giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin
grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean:
c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 -
JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant
upon its TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY
CONTACT WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in
those few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between
categorically dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND*
*DISASTER*. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe
of God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319
/ #289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as
#342 % #41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a)
literally - 'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as
#328 % #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing,
be untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign
obedience; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act
deceptively; 1c3) to cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to
cringe, feign obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 20 (#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290
% #41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order,
layer, pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300
% #41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang,
distress;

H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching:
H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43
- Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
I do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as
#360 % #41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350
% #41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what
has been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed,
finished; 2a) with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out
the contents of a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do
just as commanded, and generally involving the notion of time, to
perform the last act which completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil;
3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law,
regarding adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname
and those who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers
(naamsaanneming registers) were created to record the family names that
were adopted. These registers often assist you in your research when
moving from the civil registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the
next and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have
survived. Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and
that of his living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the
full date and place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included
the registrant’s address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the
name adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the
time, she would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed
with their children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands
were and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as
conveyed by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John
the brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The
sons of thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *IS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *NON*
*PROCREATIONAL* *CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and
do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be
revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the
LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people:
neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and
choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even
unto them will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place
and *a* *name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I*
*will* *give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not*
*be* *cut* *off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to
serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every
one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my
covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of
prayer for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor
heterosexuality as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there
would be no distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described
as “tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the
latin word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who
demonstrates exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the
male. Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only
acceptable in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman
citizen wasn't subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing
his name and family reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A
loss of legal or social standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive”
or “submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with
feminine traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the
lower class and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn
citizen took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns
who bestowed their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a
“Scultimidonus.” Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text
from the Roman Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon
ships) was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to
harsh penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported
in his journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable
by the fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex
relations with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting
their sexual authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident
related by Plutarch in his biography of Marius, illustrates the
soldier’s right to maintain his sexual integrity. In this instance, a
legionary named Trebonius was the object of sexual assaults by his
superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius was brought before a tribunal
for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and awarded a crown of bravery
for defending his masculinity and freeborn male purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship
is heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula
and mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned
in several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius
Capitolinus was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of
Marcus Claudius Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law
are still unclear. Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct
assault on homosexuality, nor penalising the general act within ancient
Rome as a crime. Instead, it was essentially a rule to police the
masculine nature of a Roman citizen by enforcing that a freeborn takes
the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term
*BINOME* as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such
guides, the fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never
develop along the lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special
insight Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more
quickly than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw
their support from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER*
*SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53
BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 -
MEASURE, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by
Michael Nylan 1993, p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF
THE DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7
aligned with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable
qualities of flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once
gentle and inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who
lulleth me to rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds
of thousands [Text corrupt.] I am the guardian of their interests,
actively working at the hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu;
twelve in the circling round, uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the
dolf
2018-08-31 00:45:14 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 31 AUGUST 2018) ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF THE LAMINATED A2 (420
X 594 MM) PRELIMINARY GRAPPLE PARADIGM WITHIN 1998

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 31 August, 2018

Thank-you for your courtesy as letter dated 7 August 2018 as made in
reply to my request of 20 July 2018 wherein you state as confirmation:
"However, luckily we {#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525):
{UMBRA: #10 as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) bud, *SPROUT*} remembered that you
gave the 4 of us a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) Preliminary Grapple
Paradigm. You gave it to us in 1998 at the end of your visit."

I would however dispute the clarity of such a recollection, since it
would have been from my perspective, surface mailed to yourselves within
a tube container around 2000 as being within proximity to the
millennium. However such a statement would be substantive enough to
sustain my $154 million damages claims which will be pursued once the
Financial Services Royal Commission (not Social Services as you contend)
at least produce their Interim Report to the Governor General by 30
September 2018.

2.5. THE PRACTICAL USE OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY (GMS, 389,36-390,18)
Although the aim of the argumentation appears to be complete, Kant, in
the ensuing paragraph, suggests another form of reasoning for the
“NECESSITY” of a pure moral philosophy. This second argument, however,
takes a completely different direction. Kant’s original question
concerning the necessity of a moral philosophy is not free of ambiguity.
For him, it was at first a matter of a necessity that referred to
cognition (“SPECULATION”: GMS, 389,37) as its goal. It could be
SUMMARIZED as follows: ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO* *OBTAIN* *KNOWLEDGE*
*OF* *MORAL* *PRINCIPLES*, *THEN* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *IS*
*AN* *INDISPENSABLE* *MEANS*.’

In Kant’s second argument, a pure moral philosophy is “INDISPENSABLY
NECESSARY” (GMS, 389,36) not only for the correct cognition but also for
the correct action. It could be said, ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO*
*CORRECTLY*, *THEN* *ONE* *NEEDS* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*.’ Kant
argues thesis: “BECAUSE MORALS THEMSELVES REMAIN SUBJECT TO ALL SORTS OF
CORRUPTION AS LONG AS THAT GUIDING THREAD AND SUPREME NORM OF THEIR
CORRECT JUDGMENT IS LACKING” (GMS, 390,2f.). The implication contained
in this argument seems, at first sight, quite strong, but it is not
clear whether Kant actually advocates it so strongly. Do we really need a
philosophical moral theory in order to act correctly? Are we compelled
to rely on a kind of philosophical expertise when dealing with moral
questions?

“THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER. I MUST ADMIT THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND A LOT
OF IT AND WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THE SOCIAL SERVICES DO!”

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 46 (#87); Ego: 33 (#49),
Male: #87; Feme: #49
}

What is essential to such a claim, is that your response was made
VOLUNTARILY and it can then be validated as authenticity by an appraisal
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as conveying both a
lack of SENSIBILITY {

H5039@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 1 (#103); Ego: 30 (#82),
@4: Sup: 6 (#109); Ego: 5 (#87),
Male: #109; Feme: #87
} // #87

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #87 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#87 as [#50, #2, #30, #5] = nebalah (H5039): {UMBRA: #11 as #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *SENSELESSNESS*, folly; 1a) disgraceful folly; 1a1) of
immorality, profane actions; 1b) disgrace, contumely disgrace;

} about any importance associated with such artefact (as you rightfully
say it was 20 years ago) as having any intrinsic worth, and that
rightfully I had conveyed it to yourselves for purposes of SECURITY /
SAFETY {



H983@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 32 (#62); Ego: 2 (#32),
@3: Sup: 41 (#103); Ego: 9 (#41),
@4: Sup: 49 (#152); Ego: 8 (#49),
Male: #152; Feme: #49
} // #49

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#49 as [#30, #2, #9, #8] = betach (H983): {UMBRA: #5 as #19 % #41 = #19}
1) *SECURITY*, *SAFETY* adverb; 2) securely;

} which is not then reliant upon yourselves retaining any possession of
the OBJECT but rather, that the incongruity of the EVENT disclosure
causes you to have some recollection of it having occurred. Which is
sufficient for my purposes.

Such an implication seems hardly congruent with the rest of Kant’s
remarks. There remains nonetheless the possibility of a weaker
interpretation. In this context, the expression “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” does
not entail only the explicit theory, whose formulation the scientific
discipline of philosophy has as one of its tasks. Rather every human or
rational being possesses a “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” if she has the capacity to
act from principle (“FOR THE SAKE OF”: GMS, 390,5). Accordingly, every
being capable of action carries at least implicitly a moral philosophy
in itself.

In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).

Thus we can consider this process of motion by impetus to act in
accordance with KINETIC principles which can be expressed a having
utility by a combining form with the general sense “movement, activity,”
where it is used in the formation of compound words, often with the
particular senses such as:

PHOTOKINESIS: “reaction to a stimulus”,
TELEKINESIS: “movement without an apparent physical cause”,
KARYOKINESIS: “activity within a cell”.

As primarily concerned with potentiality and actuality which are
principles of a dichotomy which Aristotle used to analyze motion,
causality, ethics, and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics,
Nicomachean Ethics and De Anima, which is about the human psyche.

The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any
"POSSIBILITY" that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not
consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of
those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and
nothing stops them. Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the
motion, change or activity that represents an exercise or fulfilment of
a possibility, when a possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potentiality_and_actuality>

The hypothetical postulation is that the cognitive proposition itself is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

Within the basic philosophical sense of inner TELOS, or guiding form,
the entelecheia is that which mediates between #1 - MATTER {ATZILUTH:
World of Emanation / #VIRTUE} and #2 - FORM {BRIYAH: World of Creation /
#TOOLS}, #3 - POTENCY {YETZIRAH: World of Formation / #POSITION} and #4
- ACTUALITY {ASSIYAH: World of Action / #TIME}, the matter or substance
of thing (materia, substantia), as such, convey the essence of a thing
(essentia, ousia) only potentiality, whereas the form, as considered in
itself as actuality, requires embodiment. The actualization of the
thing, the union of matter and form in development and occurrence, the
movement from potency to act, rests upon the inner TELOS, the inward
principle of self-realization; the motive force of the development is
kinesis or metabole, the activity or transition from potency to
actuality. Description of the soul as entelechy marks an important
counter; both for philosophy and for scholastic theology, to Platonic
dualism of soul and body.

Potentiality and potency are translations of the Ancient Greek word
dunamis (δύναμις) as it is used by Aristotle as a concept contrasting
with actuality. Its Latin translation is "potentia", root of the English
word potential, and used by some scholars instead of the Greek or
English variants.

In his philosophy, Aristotle distinguished two meanings of the word
dunamis. According to his understanding of nature there was both a weak
sense of potential {YIN CH'I as MALE}, meaning simply that something
"might chance to happen or not to happen", and a stronger sense {YANG
CH'I as FEME}, to indicate how something could be done well.

Dunamis is an ordinary Greek word for possibility or capability.
Depending on context, it could be translated "potency", "potential",
"capacity", "ability", "power", "capability", "strength", "possibility",
"force" and is the root of modern English words "dynamic", "dynamite",
and "dynamo". In early modern philosophy, English authors like Hobbes
and Locke used the English word "power" as their translation of Latin
potentia.

Just as Aristotelianism allows no separation of form and matter and no
independent, extra-mental existence of universalia, so does it deny the
dualism or separability of soul and body. The body, in Aristotelianism,
is not regarded as the tomb of the soul, but as the natural place of the
soul's existence where alone it can exercise its faculties of
*INTELLECTUS* and *VOLUNTAS* and in which alone it can perform its
formal *GENITIVE* function.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

The Sovereign Authority which is bequeathed to the AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH by Queen Victoria through the LETTERS PATENT *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* and according to the good word of God as Divine Graciousness,
in the bestowal of a "HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which is a
DUNAMIS a POTENTIALITY requiring EXOUSIA means ‘bearer of ruling
authority' as ACTUALITY which conveys all the necessary "POWERS
(DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians 3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12
(KJV)] as expressing the totality of the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the
MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous Right", the "Power to
Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine Authority" being
PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be understood in our
knowledge of God (GODHEAD/DIVINE NATURE AS MIND), and having thereby,
invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth
of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent and permitted the
status as authority, powers and privilege accorded within it's own
entitlement as Sovereignty implicit to the Federation as Commonwealth of
Australia.

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"



#6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk.
Arche - a commencement, or (concrete) *chief* (*in* *various*
*applications* *of* *order*, *time*, *place* *or* *rank*):--beginning,
corner, (at the, the) first (estate), *magistrate*, power, principality,
principle, rule)}

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}

IX - AUTHORITY "TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS
TO SHALL SEEM MEET" IS GIVEN BY THE "*TIME* *TO* *TIME*" AND "GOVERNOR
GENERAL'S *INCAPACITY*" PROVISIONS OF THE CLAUSE RELATING TO THE ENNEAD
- #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)} *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR*
*LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our said
Commonwealth.

*NO* *SUCH* *POWERS* *OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* IN SUCH
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, OR SUCH OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR*
*THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN* *THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED BECAUSE WE ARE DRAWING DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT GOD IS AN OATH
MADE AS GODHEAD/DIVINE MIND DEFINED BY EITHER THE HETEROS OR HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER AND SUPERSEDING THE PATENTS BY THE LATER?

In this ontological view, the human being is termed a composite
substance (substantia compositiva) and the soul in itself termed
spiritus incompletus. Thus the Protestant scholastics can call the soul
the #6 - FORMA CORPORIS, or form of the body, defining the body itself
as the formata, or thing formed." [(c) 1985, Richard A. Muller,
Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms, p 104]

Therefore, fleshed—out scientific theories can help us make explicit the
implicit philosophical knowledge that is present in every person and
therewith isolate the a priori part from the empirical part. Such an
explicit knowledge can serve as a reliable “GUIDING THREAD” for action.
According to Kant, one can speak of a “PURITY OF MORALS” (GMS, 390,17)
only if the normative principles with which we ground our actions are
“PURE” and contain no “empirical” elements.

Thus, the scientific discipline of philosophy has a supporting but not a
constitutive function for the morality of our conduct. A metaphysics of
morals, as an explicitly fleshed-out philosophical theory, can, however,
offer a supporting contribution in making the “IDEA OF A PURE PRACTICAL
REASON,” which, according to Kant, lies in each of us, “EFFECTIVE IN
CONCRETO” (GMS, 389,35).

As you may observe still rather busy with my workload after 24 years of
informal research into the obtuse province of metempiricial /
metaphysical perennialist philosophy having a specialist expertise in
Queen Victoria's Letters Patent to the Federation of the Australian
Commonwealth in 1901, and have subsequently begun a syncretism of
Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and the
Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787), which ware enormous works and one
of the most important on Western thought.

It perhaps presumptuous of me at only page #16 of #323 pages to already
be taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis
that there must be a “PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which is “SELF EVIDENT"
given that there are seven day designates within our understanding of
the cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of
nature. And that the subject we are contending with is a consideration
of profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than 14 eminent
university professors.

It has been my task to have commenced reading it on weekend of 25 August
2018 in the hope that probity and decorum will return (ie. I NOTE THAT
ON THE MONDAY FOLLOWING THE PRIME MINISTER LEADERSHIP SPILL OCCURRING
UPON 23 AUGUST 2018 THAT THE SWEARING OF OATHS OF OFFICE ARE NOW MADE TO
THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND NOT TO THE SOVEREIGN) to the
governance of this Commonwealth given its CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- IMPUGNING AS CURSING THE SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- IMPUGNING OUR ENTITLEMENT TO FAIR JUSTICE;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- AS A BATTLE CRY THEN IMPUGNING OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION WHOM HAVE
ENGAGED WITHIN THEATRES OF WAR;

+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- IMPUGNING OUR RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF IN THE EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY
WILL WITHOUT COERCION;

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU {*LOGICAL* *FALLACY* *WITHIN*
*BINOMIAL* *PYTHAGOREAN* *HETEROS* *THEORY* *OF* *NUMBER* *DERIVED*
*BELIEF* *SYSTEMS* *AND* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}

Although I have already within 6 days, as written some 100 pages as
substantive and reasonable argumentation, was indeed prudent to firstly
have established the starting point of necessity as to any premises for
the continuity of enquiry, in doing so I recognise as my ignorance with
respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject
matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as
something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational
cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful
manner rather than with the intoxication of self-entitlement which
others might bestow.

Whereby the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as their SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.



[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly, having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#SENSIBILITY #ALTRUISM #SELF #JUSTIFICATION
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-31 01:13:27 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 31 AUGUST 2018) ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF THE LAMINATED A2 (420
X 594 MM) PRELIMINARY GRAPPLE PARADIGM WITHIN 1998

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 31 August, 2018

Thank-you for your courtesy as letter dated 7 August 2018 as made in
reply to my request of 20 July 2018 wherein you state as confirmation:
"However, luckily we {#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525):
{UMBRA: #10 as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) bud, *SPROUT*} remembered that you
gave the 4 of us a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) Preliminary Grapple
Paradigm. You gave it to us in 1998 at the end of your visit."

I would however dispute the clarity of such a recollection, since it
would have been from my perspective, surface mailed to yourselves within
a tube container around 2000 as being within proximity to the
millennium. However such a statement would be substantive enough to
sustain my $154 million damages claims which will be pursued once the
Financial Services Royal Commission (not Social Services as you contend)
at least produce their Interim Report to the Governor General by 30
September 2018.

2.5. THE PRACTICAL USE OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY (GMS, 389,36-390,18)
Although the aim of the argumentation appears to be complete, Kant, in
the ensuing paragraph, suggests another form of reasoning for the
“NECESSITY” of a pure moral philosophy. This second argument, however,
takes a completely different direction. Kant’s original question
concerning the necessity of a moral philosophy is not free of ambiguity.
For him, it was at first a matter of a necessity that referred to
cognition (“SPECULATION”: GMS, 389,37) as its goal. It could be
SUMMARIZED as follows: ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO* *OBTAIN* *KNOWLEDGE*
*OF* *MORAL* *PRINCIPLES*, *THEN* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *IS*
*AN* *INDISPENSABLE* *MEANS*.’

In Kant’s second argument, a pure moral philosophy is “INDISPENSABLY
NECESSARY” (GMS, 389,36) not only for the correct cognition but also for
the correct action. It could be said, ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO*
*CORRECTLY*, *THEN* *ONE* *NEEDS* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*.’ Kant
argues thesis: “BECAUSE MORALS THEMSELVES REMAIN SUBJECT TO ALL SORTS OF
CORRUPTION AS LONG AS THAT GUIDING THREAD AND SUPREME NORM OF THEIR
CORRECT JUDGMENT IS LACKING” (GMS, 390,2f.). The implication contained
in this argument seems, at first sight, quite strong, but it is not
clear whether Kant actually advocates it so strongly. Do we really need
a philosophical moral theory in order to act correctly? Are we compelled
to rely on a kind of philosophical expertise when dealing with moral
questions?

“THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER. I MUST ADMIT THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND A LOT
OF IT AND WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THE SOCIAL SERVICES DO!”

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 46 (#87); Ego: 33 (#49),
Male: #87; Feme: #49
}

What is essential to such a claim, is that your response was made
VOLUNTARILY and it can then be validated as authenticity by an appraisal
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as conveying both a
lack of SENSIBILITY {

H5039@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 1 (#103); Ego: 30 (#82),
@4: Sup: 6 (#109); Ego: 5 (#87),
Male: #109; Feme: #87
} // #87

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #87 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#87 as [#50, #2, #30, #5] = nebalah (H5039): {UMBRA: #11 as #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *SENSELESSNESS*, folly; 1a) disgraceful folly; 1a1) of
immorality, profane actions; 1b) disgrace, contumely disgrace;

} about any importance associated with such artefact (as you rightfully
say it was 20 years ago) as having any intrinsic worth, and that
rightfully I had conveyed it to yourselves for purposes of SECURITY /
SAFETY {

H983@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 32 (#62); Ego: 2 (#32),
@3: Sup: 41 (#103); Ego: 9 (#41),
@4: Sup: 49 (#152); Ego: 8 (#49),
Male: #152; Feme: #49
} // #49

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#49 as [#30, #2, #9, #8] = betach (H983): {UMBRA: #5 as #19 % #41 = #19}
1) *SECURITY*, *SAFETY* adverb; 2) securely;

} which is not then reliant upon yourselves retaining any possession of
the OBJECT but rather, that the incongruity of the EVENT disclosure
causes you to have some recollection of it having occurred. Which is
sufficient for my purposes.

Such an implication seems hardly congruent with the rest of Kant’s
remarks. There remains nonetheless the possibility of a weaker
interpretation. In this context, the expression “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” does
not entail only the explicit theory, whose formulation the scientific
discipline of philosophy has as one of its tasks. Rather every human or
rational being possesses a “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” if she has the capacity to
act from principle (“FOR THE SAKE OF”: GMS, 390,5). Accordingly, every
being capable of action carries at least implicitly a moral philosophy
in itself.

In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).

Thus we can consider this process of motion by impetus to act in
accordance with KINETIC principles which can be expressed a having
utility by a combining form with the general sense “movement, activity,”
where it is used in the formation of compound words, often with the
particular senses such as:

PHOTOKINESIS: “reaction to a stimulus”,
TELEKINESIS: “movement without an apparent physical cause”,
KARYOKINESIS: “activity within a cell”.

As primarily concerned with potentiality and actuality which are
principles of a dichotomy which Aristotle used to analyze motion,
causality, ethics, and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics,
Nicomachean Ethics and De Anima, which is about the human psyche.

The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any
"POSSIBILITY" that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not
consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of
those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and
nothing stops them. Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the
motion, change or activity that represents an exercise or fulfilment of
a possibility, when a possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potentiality_and_actuality>

The hypothetical postulation is that the cognitive proposition itself is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

Within the basic philosophical sense of inner TELOS, or guiding form,
the entelecheia is that which mediates between #1 - MATTER {ATZILUTH:
World of Emanation / #VIRTUE} and #2 - FORM {BRIYAH: World of Creation /
#TOOLS}, #3 - POTENCY {YETZIRAH: World of Formation / #POSITION} and #4
- ACTUALITY {ASSIYAH: World of Action / #TIME}, the matter or substance
of thing (materia, substantia), as such, convey the essence of a thing
(essentia, ousia) only potentiality, whereas the form, as considered in
itself as actuality, requires embodiment. The actualization of the
thing, the union of matter and form in development and occurrence, the
movement from potency to act, rests upon the inner TELOS, the inward
principle of self-realization; the motive force of the development is
kinesis or metabole, the activity or transition from potency to
actuality. Description of the soul as entelechy marks an important
counter; both for philosophy and for scholastic theology, to Platonic
dualism of soul and body.

Potentiality and potency are translations of the Ancient Greek word
dunamis (δύναμις) as it is used by Aristotle as a concept contrasting
with actuality. Its Latin translation is "potentia", root of the English
word potential, and used by some scholars instead of the Greek or
English variants.

In his philosophy, Aristotle distinguished two meanings of the word
dunamis. According to his understanding of nature there was both a weak
sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that something
"might chance to happen or not to happen", and a stronger sense {YANG
CH'I as A MALE}, to indicate how something could be done well.

Dunamis is an ordinary Greek word for possibility or capability.
Depending on context, it could be translated "potency", "potential",
"capacity", "ability", "power", "capability", "strength", "possibility",
"force" and is the root of modern English words "dynamic", "dynamite",
and "dynamo". In early modern philosophy, English authors like Hobbes
and Locke used the English word "power" as their translation of Latin
potentia.

Just as Aristotelianism allows no separation of form and matter and no
independent, extra-mental existence of universalia, so does it deny the
dualism or separability of soul and body. The body, in Aristotelianism,
is not regarded as the tomb of the soul, but as the natural place of the
soul's existence where alone it can exercise its faculties of
*INTELLECTUS* and *VOLUNTAS* and in which alone it can perform its
formal *GENITIVE* function.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

The Sovereign Authority which is bequeathed to the AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH by Queen Victoria through the LETTERS PATENT *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* and according to the good word of God as Divine Graciousness,
in the bestowal of a "HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which is a
DUNAMIS a POTENTIALITY requiring EXOUSIA means ‘bearer of ruling
authority' as ACTUALITY which conveys all the necessary "POWERS
(DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians 3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12
(KJV)] as expressing the totality of the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the
MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous Right", the "Power to
Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine Authority" being
PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be understood in our
knowledge of God (GODHEAD/DIVINE NATURE AS MIND), and having thereby,
invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth
of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent and permitted the
status as authority, powers and privilege accorded within it's own
entitlement as Sovereignty implicit to the Federation as Commonwealth of
Australia.

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"

http://youtu.be/rjkrjYitgeA

#6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk.
Arche - a commencement, or (concrete) *chief* (*in* *various*
*applications* *of* *order*, *time*, *place* *or* *rank*):--beginning,
corner, (at the, the) first (estate), *magistrate*, power, principality,
principle, rule)}

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}

IX - AUTHORITY "TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS
TO SHALL SEEM MEET" IS GIVEN BY THE "*TIME* *TO* *TIME*" AND "GOVERNOR
GENERAL'S *INCAPACITY*" PROVISIONS OF THE CLAUSE RELATING TO THE ENNEAD
- #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)} *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR*
*LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our said
Commonwealth.

*NO* *SUCH* *POWERS* *OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* IN SUCH
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, OR SUCH OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR*
*THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN* *THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED BECAUSE WE ARE DRAWING DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT GOD IS AN OATH
MADE AS GODHEAD/DIVINE MIND DEFINED BY EITHER THE HETEROS OR HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER AND SUPERSEDING THE PATENTS BY THE LATER?

In this ontological view, the human being is termed a composite
substance (substantia compositiva) and the soul in itself termed
spiritus incompletus. Thus the Protestant scholastics can call the soul
the #6 - FORMA CORPORIS, or form of the body, defining the body itself
as the formata, or thing formed." [(c) 1985, Richard A. Muller,
Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms, p 104]

Therefore, fleshed—out scientific theories can help us make explicit the
implicit philosophical knowledge that is present in every person and
therewith isolate the a priori part from the empirical part. Such an
explicit knowledge can serve as a reliable “GUIDING THREAD” for action.
According to Kant, one can speak of a “PURITY OF MORALS” (GMS, 390,17)
only if the normative principles with which we ground our actions are
“PURE” and contain no “empirical” elements.

Thus, the scientific discipline of philosophy has a supporting but not a
constitutive function for the morality of our conduct. A metaphysics of
morals, as an explicitly fleshed-out philosophical theory, can, however,
offer a supporting contribution in making the “IDEA OF A PURE PRACTICAL
REASON,” which, according to Kant, lies in each of us, “EFFECTIVE IN
CONCRETO” (GMS, 389,35).

As you may observe still rather busy with my workload after 24 years of
informal research into the obtuse province of metempiricial /
metaphysical perennialist philosophy having a specialist expertise in
Queen Victoria's Letters Patent to the Federation of the Australian
Commonwealth in 1901, and have subsequently begun a syncretism of
Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and the
Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787), which ware enormous works and one
of the most important on Western thought.

It perhaps presumptuous of me at only page #16 of #323 pages to already
be taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis
that there must be a “PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which is “SELF EVIDENT"
given that there are seven day designates within our understanding of
the cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of
nature. And that the subject we are contending with is a consideration
of profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than 14 eminent
university professors.

It has been my task to have commenced reading it on weekend of 25 August
2018 in the hope that probity and decorum will return (ie. I NOTE THAT
ON THE MONDAY FOLLOWING THE PRIME MINISTER LEADERSHIP SPILL OCCURRING
UPON 23 AUGUST 2018 THAT THE SWEARING OF OATHS OF OFFICE ARE NOW MADE TO
THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND NOT TO THE SOVEREIGN) to the
governance of this Commonwealth given its CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- IMPUGNING AS CURSING THE SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- IMPUGNING OUR ENTITLEMENT TO FAIR JUSTICE;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- AS A BATTLE CRY THEN IMPUGNING OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION WHOM HAVE
ENGAGED WITHIN THEATRES OF WAR;

+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- IMPUGNING OUR RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF IN THE EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY
WILL WITHOUT COERCION;

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU {*LOGICAL* *FALLACY* *WITHIN*
*BINOMIAL* *PYTHAGOREAN* *HETEROS* *THEORY* *OF* *NUMBER* *DERIVED*
*BELIEF* *SYSTEMS* *AND* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}

Although I have already within 6 days, as written some 100 pages as
substantive and reasonable argumentation, was indeed prudent to firstly
have established the starting point of necessity as to any premises for
the continuity of enquiry, in doing so I recognise as my ignorance with
respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject
matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as
something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational
cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful
manner rather than with the intoxication of self-entitlement which
others might bestow.

Whereby the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as their SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly, having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#SENSIBILITY #ALTRUISM #SELF #JUSTIFICATION
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-09-01 07:26:06 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 1 September 2018) REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A
LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED
DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 1 September, 2018

DOLF @ 0815 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "Our intention so far has been
neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes as partisan
propensity for societal and political cataclysm on the pretence of an
emancipation, which convey the vernacular notion of CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE, but rather to informally engage within a process of a self
education as to enlightenment and participate within discourse upon the
dialectics of *ONTIC* necessity, its delimitation by the GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET which is implicit to the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. *VOLUNTARY* *WILL*) as the systemic basis for
ideas initiation and facilitation, the dialectic of language (eg:
English) itself and lastly its circumscribing of the ontological
experience through the means of a dialectic of dissertation whether as
formalised theatric prosody presented dogmatically, as arbitrary
prescription or simply as opined proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora
of opportunity.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1636 HOURS
ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "If you can't express your idea in clear, simple
terms that all can understand, it means your idea is crap."

— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —

“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.

WELL KISS MY RING.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD.”

YOUTUBE: "Disturbed - The Sound Of Silence [Official Music Video]"



2.6. A METHODOLOGICAL NEW BEGINNING (GMS, 390: *RAPACIOUS*,19-391:
*HOMOIOS*,15: *MARKER*)
Kant asserts that the process of working out such a metaphysics of
morals is “AN ENTIRELY NEW FIELD [...] TO BE ENTERED ON” (GMS, 390,22
f.). He therewith contrasts the type of theory he introduces with all
other approaches that had been previously worked out in the history of
philosophy. Kant is not humble in his claims. Not only does he claim
that the philosophy before him had not found the right moral theory. It
is his opinion that all previous approaches were on the wrong track from
their very starting points.

— ANZACS WHAT FOR? —

“OUR ANZACS WENT TO WAR.
HITLER WAS A CORPORAL.
IT WAS FOR NOTHING MORE.
PRINCIPLE RIGHT OR MORAL.

ANZACS DIED SO MAY WE LIVE.
TO SEE HITLER IN THE MIRROR.
NO REASON CAN THEY GIVE.
HIS REFLECTION OUR TERROR.

GOVERNOR GENERAL KNEELS.
TO PAPAL RING CONFOUND.
FROM US THE EMPIRE STEALS.
DEAD UPON BARREN GROUND.”

DOLF @ 1704 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "Once again you are lacking
integrity in responding to an obsoleted as an earlier draft and
especially #168 - CONDEMNATION {

48 8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#48 (@4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*

H6@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 36 (#101); Ego: 1 (#36),
@4: Sup: 38 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 2 (#38),
@5: Sup: 48 (#187); Ego: 10 (#48),
@6: Sup: 52 (#239); Ego: 4 (#52),
@7: Sup: 21 (#260); Ego: 50 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@8: Sup: 27 (#287); Ego: 6 (#108),
Male: #287; Feme: #108
} // #108 <-- #4 as {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9
{#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common way;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; *I* *AM* *NOT* *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *WEEPING* *TO* *ANY*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168

#108 as [#30, #5, #1, #2, #10, #4, #50, #6] = 'abad (H6): {UMBRA: #42 as
#108 % #41 = #26} 1) perish, vanish, go astray, be destroyed; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) perish, die, be exterminated; 1a2) perish, vanish (fig.); 1a3) be
lost, strayed; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to destroy, kill, cause to perish, to
give up (as lost), exterminate; 1b2) to blot out, do away with, cause to
vanish, (fig.); 1b3) cause to stray, lose; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
destroy, put to death; 1c1a) *OF* *DIVINE* *JUDGMENT*; 1c2) *OBJECT*
*NAME* *OF* *KINGS* (*FIGURATIVE*);

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical
conception about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of
reactance and the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of
polarisation as materia secunda as an alternative canonical approach to
mathematically expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN
as FEME} bi-conditionals in terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the
same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei
essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of
righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
in which man was originally created).

"And Pharaoh's servants said unto him, How long shall this man be a
snare unto us? let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God:
knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed {#108 as [#30, #5, #1, #2,
#10, #4, #50, #6] = 'abad (H6): perish}?" [Exodus 10:7 (KJV)]

} and #451 - *CONTEMN* [cf: IDEA @215 OF ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK
(1941-1944)] {

"THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN THE MORNING
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."

ANY_PROSPENSITY_FOR_JUSTICE_IS_WHAT_YOU_HAVE_FORGOTTEN@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 53 (#91); Ego: 78 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@3: Sup: 36 (#127); Ego: 16 (#131),
@4: Sup: 30 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 63 (#194),
@5: Sup: 74 (#231); Ego: 12 (#206),
@6: Sup: 52 (#283); Ego: 65 (#271),
Male: #283; Feme: #271
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,283}&idea:{f,271}>

H2143@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 7 (#43),
@4: Sup: 63 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 20 (#63),
@5: Sup: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 38 (#101),
@6: Sup: 40 (#208); Ego: 20 (#121),
Male: #208; Feme: #121
} // #283

#283 as [#6, #30, #7, #20, #200, #20] = zeker (H2143): {UMBRA: #3 as
#227 % #41 = #22} 1) *MEMORIAL*, *REMEMBRANCE*; 1a) remembrance, memory;
1b) memorial;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #227 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175 <-- JINGOISM / FRAUDULENT PIETY IN BREACH OF SECTION 116 TO
THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as #34 (@7 - Engendering
Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 - Honour your parents])
/ #175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature
[#205 - Do not steal]) ...

H1921@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 15 (#32); Ego: 4 (#15),
@4: Sup: 21 (#53); Ego: 6 (#21),
@5: Sup: 59 (#112); Ego: 38 (#59),
@6: Sup: 69 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 10
(#69),
@7: Sup: 28 (#209); Ego: 40 (#109),
Male: #209; Feme: #109
} // #271

#271 as [#6, #5, #4, #6, #200, #10, #40] = hadar (H1921): {UMBRA: #4 as
#209 % #41 = #4} 1) to honour, adorn, glorify, be high; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to swell; 1a1a) swelling (pass participle); 1a2) to honour, pay honour
to, show partiality; 1a3) to adorn; 1a3a) adorned (pass participle); 1b)
(Niphal) to be honoured; 1c) (Hithpael) to honour oneself, claim honour;

The Ode comes from For the Fallen, a poem by the English poet and writer
Laurence Binyon and was published in London in the Winnowing Fan; Poems
of the Great War in 1914. Each year after Anzac Day and Remembrance Day
debate rises on the word 'condemn' or 'contemn'.

} as bestowal upon yourself this REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY 11 NOVEMBER
2018 CENTENNIAL is as simple as it needs to be.

H5771@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 72 (#74); Ego: 70 (#72),
@3: Sup: 78 (#152); Ego: 6 (#78),
@4: Sup: 47 (#199); Ego: 50 (#128),
@5: Sup: 80 (#279); Ego: 33 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #279; Feme: #161
} // #168

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #168 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; *I* *AM* *NOT* *RAPACIOUS*.

#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102

#168 as [#2, #70, #6, #50, #600] = `avon (H5771): {UMBRA: #11 as #168 %
#41 = #4} 1) perversity, depravity, iniquity, guilt or punishment of
iniquity; 1a) iniquity; 1b) guilt of iniquity, guilt (as great), guilt
(of condition); 1c) *CONSEQUENCE* *OF* *OR* *PUNISHMENT* *FOR* *INIQUITY*;

— PRELAPSARIAN —

“OH DEAR ‘TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.

SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E’RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY’RE STARTING TO STARE.”

*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective):
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

"And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment {#168 as [#2, #70, #6, #50,
#600] = `avon (H5771): iniquity} is greater than I can bear." [Genesis
4:13 (KJV)]

SEE ALSO: "2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.1%20THE%20LOGICAL%20STRUCTURE%20OF%20ETHICAL%20PRINCIPLES.pdf>

It doesn’t require your permissibility and especially so when I am
intentionally deploying a superlative linguistic rhetorical form which
is characterised by an infusion of florid semantical constructions.

— STRAWBERRIES —

"CALIGULA'S ARMY MARCHES,
ALL ACROSS THE LAND.
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES.
WITH BASKETS IN HAND.

LIKE A LITTLE SMURF,
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND.
FROM MOUNT TO SURF.
IT'S SUCH A GRIND.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
TIME IS MONEY.
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER.
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY.

SPIT THE DUMMY.
SO MUCH TO COUNT.
PEE A PENNY.
MORE TO MOUNT."

"And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but
this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will
not destroy [it] for ten's sake." [Genesis 18:32 (KJV)]

I would not find 10 among you...

And shake the dust off my feet.

Here pussy pussy {ie. the 'boy-pussy' was a smaller version of the
cat-o-nine-tails as known to being a colonial authoritative punishment
instrument of slavery / shipping and gave rise to the expression:

'TAKE IT LIKE A MAN'!}"

YOUTUBE: "Ten Little Indians (Popular Nursery)"



Clearly if the subject exceeds your simple and savage intellectual
capability then it’s time recuse yourself pussy boy."

For an interpretation of this passage in the text, the fact that moral
principles, according to Kant, can serve not only as criterion for
judgment but also as genuine grounds of action is significant. For Kant,
actions are truly moral solely if not only the principles of valuation
but also the particular grounds of action for the acting persons are
free of all empirical content. Moral principles must be our grounds of
action. Kant intimates therewith one of his central thesis that he will
more thoroughly develop in the course of the Groundwork. Kant accuses
Christian Wolff and with him the entire moral philosophical tradition of
not clearly recognizing this. In their moral-philosophies, they did not
investigate “THE IDEA AND PRINCIPLES OF A POSSIBLE PURE WILL” but began
their investigations with “THE ACTIONS AND CONDITIONS OF HUMAN VOLITION
IN GENERAL,” which (and this is where Kant sees the methodological
mistake) “ARE FOR THE MOST PART DRAWN FROM PSYCHOLOGY” (GMS, 390,34—37).
According to Kant, exclusively a metaphysics of morals, free from all
empirical content and based on the analysis of a “PURE WILL,” is an
appropriate foundation for the working out of a normative theory of
morality. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]

DOLF @ 1726 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "Which as DATA SET knowledge
provided by the HEBREW / GREEK Biblical lexicon being the CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING as coming into my possession as expressed by a time
stamped @ 2019 HOURS ON 28 JULY 2011, then had a confirmation to its
existence within my possession only upon 19 MAY 2016 in having at such
prior time been DATA MINED by my own undertaking and ingenuity in being
sourced from a *FOREIGN* *AGENT* named RICHARD AMIEL MCGOUGH, whom is
well educated within mathematics and quantum physics and currently a
software engineer at 4QTRS within YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA and this occurred following his debunked BIBLE WHEEL PROJECT
(2001-2011) as research MATERIAL which accompanied a selective computed
#288 - UMBRA by contrived GEMATRIA value being a DATA MANIPULATION that
whilst initially obscured by myself, regardlessly conveyed a clear MENS
REA {ie. the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part
of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused} of
defeasance (French: défaire, to undo) which within law, is an instrument
which defeats the force or operation of some other deed or estate; as
distinguished from condition, that which in the same deed is called a
condition is a defeasance in another deed. Thusly irrefutably sustains
the gravitas of my claim as to there being tangibility by ACTUS REUS
{ie. action or conduct which is a constituent element of a crime, as
opposed to the mental state of the accused} and therefore reasonable
concerns for my safety, wellbeing and security.

However this MALFEASANCE is unlawful conduct by a public authority such
as the Victoria Police or the Returned Services League (RSL) under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: “(1) Subject to this section, *IT*
*IS* *UNLAWFUL* *FOR* *A* *PUBLIC* *AUTHORITY* *TO* *ACT* *IN* *A* *WAY*
*THAT* *IS* *INCOMPATIBLE* *WITH* *A* *HUMAN* *RIGHT* *OR*, *IN*
*MAKING* *A* *DECISION*, *TO* *FAIL* *TO* *GIVE* *PROPER*
*CONSIDERATION* *TO* *A* *RELEVANT* *HUMAN* *RIGHT*.

MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act
that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing
used especially of an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the
Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com

There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

PROVING THAT ROMAN CATHOLIC IDENTITY IS EQUIVALENTLY NAZISM: I think the
way to do it is by advancing the argument of PRO DOMO and point out the
#541 - VIRGIN MARY OVERSHADOWED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT as CATHOLIC DOGMA is
associated to ADOLF HITLER’s THEORY OF #419 - SLAUGHTER and #351 -
MARRIAGE as espouse within IDEA @215 of his TABLE TALK and ask whether
this is central to his NEO-PLATONIC conception of #ONE.

DOLF SMS DIALOG @ 1019 HOURS ON 15 JULY 2018: "TODAY'S POEM ATTEMPTS TO
BRIDGE A NEURAL LINGUISTIC CONNECTION BETWEEN THE MANDALAY LAS VEGAS
MASSACRE and local events:

— MANDALAY SWAY —
[Bastille Day on Saturday 14 July 2018]

“STEVE DOTH MOW.
HIS PADDOCK TODAY.
BUT NO EVIL TO SOW.
OR DEATH ITS SWAY.

A GREETING WAVE.
OF FATES COURSE.
AND WICKED NIEVE {#541 as [#80, #400, #3, #40, #8, #10] = pugme (G4435):
{#53 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) the fist, clenched hand; 2) up to the elbow}
ETERNITY DIVORCE {#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] =
apokteino (G615): {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way
whatever; 2) metaphor: to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow
to perish; 2a) to inflict mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF*
*SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE* *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*}.

MUSIC PLAYS CLEAR.
RHAPSODY SO PURE.
OF HEAVEN’S CHEER.
AND GRACE DEMURE.”

CONTEMN@{
@1: Sup: 71 (#71); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 13 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 43 (#65),
@3: Sup: 14 (#98); Ego: 29 (#94),
@4: Sup: 69 (#167); Ego: 32 (#126),
@5: Sup: 51 (#218); Ego: 34 (#160),
@6: Sup: 3 (#221); Ego: 65 (#225),
@7: Sup: 52 (#273); Ego: 45 (#270),
@8: Sup: 61 (#334); Ego: 12 (#282), <-- *MENS* *REA*: #334 as [#40,
#4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 = #19}
1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

@9: Sup: 13 (#347); Ego: 48 (#330 - SECRET NAME: HRUMACHIS - 'The
Holy Spirit of Truth and Justice'),
@10: Sup: 35 (#382); Ego: 24 (#354),
@11: Sup: 75 (#457); Ego: 38 (#392),
@12: Sup: 21 (#478); Ego: 17 (#409),
@13: Sup: 63 (#541); Ego: 38 (#447),
Male: #541; Feme: #447
}

ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK AS IDEA @215: "TO MY WAY OF THINKING, THE REAL
IDEAL IS THAT TWO BEINGS SHOULD UNITE FOR LIFE {

#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;

} AND THAT THEIR LOVE SHOULD BE SANCTIFIED BY THE PRESENCE OF CHILDREN.
IF OUR FARMS HAVE REMAINED OFTEN FOR CENTURIES, IN SOME CASES FOR AS
LONG AS SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS, IN THE POSSESSION OF THE SAME FAMILY, IT IS
FOR THE MOST PART BECAUSE MARRIAGES WERE ARRANGED ONLY WHEN AN INFANT
WAS ON THE WAY. AND FOR CENTURIES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BOWED TO THIS
CUSTOM AND TOLERATED WHAT WAS CALLED 'THE TRIAL'. WHEN THE BIRTH OF THE
INFANT WAS IMMINENT, THE PRIEST WOULD REMIND THE FUTURE FATHER OF HIS
DUTY TO MARRY. UNFORTUNATELY THE PROTESTANT CHURCH HAS BROKEN WITH THESE
HEALTHY CUSTOMS AND HAS PREPARED THE WAY, WITH THE AID OF LAWS WRITTEN
OR UNWRITTEN, FOR A HYPOCRISY WHOSE OBJECT IT IS TO STIGMATISE AS
SOMETHING SHAMEFUL A MARRIAGE WHICH HAS BEEN PROVOKED BY THE ARRIVAL OF
A CHILD. AND DON'T LET US FORGET, IF WE ARE GOING TO BE COMPLETELY
TRUTHFUL, THAT A LARGE PART OF THE PRUSSIAN NOBILITY OWES ITS EXISTENCE
TO A FAUX-PAS ON THE PART OF ONE OF THE GIRLS OF THE BOURGEOISIE.

MOREOVER, THESE PREJUDICES ONLY OPERATE IN REVERSE, AND LOGIC HAS NO
BEARING ON THE TREND OF OUR DESIRES--FOR THE *ADMISSIBILITY* *OF* *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *INCOMPATIBILITY* *IS*
*LEGALLY* *RECOGNISED*. IF IT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW OF NATURE TO INSIST
ON THE MAINTENANCE OF A UNION IN WHICH THE PARTNERS ARE UNABLE TO AGREE,
IT IS NO LESS WRONG TO PUT OBSTACLES IN THE WAY OF A MARRIAGE
JUSTIFIABLE ON THE GROUNDS OF PERFECT RECIPROCAL UNITY. MY AGE SAVES ME
FROM THE SUSPICION THAT I AM PERHAPS PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO* {ie.

*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
#342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
- UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of #325 - DETRUDE.

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA
/ ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO*); Ego: 1 (#341),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
*TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
presence and power of God);

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;

}, AND SO I AM ABLE TO INVITE ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM.

I SHALL HAVE NO PEACE OF MIND UNTIL I HAVE SUCCEEDED IN PLANTING A SEED
OF NORDIC BLOOD WHEREVER THE POPULATION STAND IN NEED OF REGENERATION."
[ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK AS IDEA: @215 ON 12th MAY 1942
/ PAGE: #475]

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS
ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "I WOULD LIKE TO FIND MEANINGFUL SENTENCES INSTEAD OF
INSUFFERABLE GIBBERISH:
See, there's your problem with the passive voice:

"*IS* *THERE* *TO* *BE* *FOUND*" - what do you mean? Are you finding
something, am I, or is somebody else?

But worse are the consequences of this inauspicious start to your
sentence: "RATHER THAN" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because
you've started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed
ambiguity to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb "FOUND",
or the noun "LANGUAGE"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused about what
form of words you should be using on the other side, AND you've made it
even worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT your catalogue
consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous noun/verb, and a
noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and ultimately causing
your sentence to descend into gibberish.

Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence."

DOLF @ 2020 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200,
#5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of thine
own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:4-5 (KJV)]

If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
suitable for Neural Linguistic Programming:

[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]

PANEGYRICAL_LANGUAGE@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 - *PANEGYRICAL* *LANGUAGE*),
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 - *SPEECH* *OF* *COMPULSION*),
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 *** SEE NOTE); Ego: 15 (#613),
Male: #640 - *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN* *EXPLANATION*; Feme:
#613 <-- THE TRADITION THAT #613 COMMANDMENTS (Hebrew: תרי"ג מצוות,
taryag mitzvot, "613 mitzvot") IS THE NUMBER OF MITZVOT IN THE TORAH,
BEGAN IN THE 3RD CENTURY CE, WHEN RABBI SIMLAI MENTIONED IT IN A SERMON
THAT IS RECORDED IN TALMUD MAKKOT 23b.

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,529}&idea:{f,598}&idea:{f,613}>

YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who - Victory of the Daleks - The Paradigm Daleks"



And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = *SPEECH* *OF* *COMPULSION*
{ie. *TO* *COMPEL* *ONE* *TO* *DEPART*} embedded within the subject title.

"I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied:
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5 (KJV)]

"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13 (KJV)]

"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329):
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27 (KJV)]

Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *TO* *UNFOLD* *THE* *MEANING* *OF* *WHAT*
*IS* *SAID*, *EXPLAIN*, *EXPOUND*;

*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS*
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*

#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 1a) hence renovation,
regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical
change of mind for the better. The word often used to denote the
restoration of a thing to its pristine state, its renovation, as a
renewal or restoration of life after death; 1b) the renovation of the
earth after the deluge; 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after
its destruction by fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and
glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
*THAT* *RESTORATION* *OF* *THE* *PRIMAL* *AND* *PERFECT* *CONDITION*
*OF* *THINGS* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *BEFORE* *THE* *FALL* *OF* *OUR* *FIRST*
*PARENTS*, which the Jews looked for in connection with the advent of
the Messiah, and which Christians expected in connection with the
visible return of Jesus from heaven.; 1e) other uses; 1e1) of Cicero's
restoration to rank and fortune on his recall from exile; 1e2) of the
restoration of the Jewish nation after exile; 1e3) of the recovery of
knowledge by recollection;

H1254@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX

#480 as #4, #70, #6, #400 = de`ah (H1844): {#2 as #79 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #TEN: #231 / #693 *AS* *JUXTAPOSITION*
*CONTROL*} 1) knowledge (of God);

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = } 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to be
fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH* *GOD*
*AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3)
of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
(Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;

YOUTUBE: "Awareness control instincts (Dune 1984)"



Although there have been many attempts to codify and enumerate the
commandments contained in the Torah, the most traditional enumeration is
Maimonides'. The #613 commandments include "POSITIVE COMMANDMENTS", to
perform an act (mitzvot aseh), and "NEGATIVE COMMANDMENTS", to abstain
from certain acts (mitzvot lo taaseh). The negative commandments number
#365, which coincides with the number of days in the solar year, and the
positive commandments number #248, a number ascribed to the number of
bones and main organs in the human body (Babylonian Talmud, Makkot
23b–24a). [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments>]

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS
ON 29 AUGUST 2018: "<SNIP IDIOTIC TOP-POSTING>

<SNIP IDIOTIC BIBLE QUOTES>

Actually, I *do* mind, because what you are "deploying" is
incomprehensible because it does not follow the rules of grammar but
instead seems to be following some incomprehensible rules of numerology
of your own devising.

That is the meaningless, poorly-constructed sentence I have already
addressed: [IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION,
RATHER, THAN, ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]

Your explanation fails to address the ambiguity and errors in your
sentence which rendered it meaningless. Your explanation is slightly
clearer than the original (once I SNIPped out the numerology) but it
still fails to convey any comprehensible meaning.

<SNIP BIBLE QUOTES>
<SNIP REPEATED NONSENSE>"

DOLF @ 1032 HOURS ON 29 AUGUST 2018: "Your response exhibits a
psychosis, vehemence and hysteria:

H5006@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 61 (#131); Ego: 1 (#61),
@4: Sup: 70 (#201); Ego: 9 (#70),
@5: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 50 (#120 AS ASSIGNED TO *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE #EIGHT),
@6: Sup: 49 (#289); Ego: 10 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #289; Feme: #130
} // #211

#211 as [#10, #50, #1, #90, #50, #10] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #15 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to spurn, *CONTEMN*, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to
spurn, *CONTEMN*; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *TO*
*CONTEMN*; 1c) (Hiphil) to spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) *TO* *BE* *CONTEMNED*;

Try to explain yourself with concise, reasoned and conclusive examples
of deductive, reductive or inductive CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which are
relevant to the subject:

MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX...

TRANSLATION: but we do our best

AS A METEMPIRICAL DIALECTIC CONSTRUCT: [MAIS, NOUS, FAISONS, DE, NOTRE,
MIEUX]

As a faculty of metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships
conceived as beyond and yet related to knowledge gained empirically

As GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:

55720693@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
@4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248 - [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] *TO*
*SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH* *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*)),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,211}&idea:{f,248}>

Derivative normative *ONTIC* {Male: #211 % #41 = #6; Feme: #248 % #41 =
#} necessity and SYNCRETIC {‘OTH - #2184} CONTINUUM EQUIVALENTS as
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING conveying and UMBRA modifications to ONTIC
normative premise as then causal for heuristic which is conducive to
cognition, adaptive apperception:

H1696@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 9 (#14); Ego: 4 (#9),
@3: Sup: 11 (#25); Ego: 2 (#11),
@4: Sup: 49 (#74); Ego: 38 (#49),
Male: #74; Feme: #49
} // #211

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; *I* *AM* *NOT* *FRAUDULENT* *IN* *MEASURES* *OF* *GRAIN*.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182

#211 as [#5, #4, #2, #200] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #3 as #211 % #41 =
#6} 1) *TO* *SPEAK*, *DECLARE*, *CONVERSE*, command, promise, warn,
threaten, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
flight;

G1961@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 54 (#77); Ego: 40 (#135),
@5: Sup: 59 (#136); Ego: 5 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I
AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
@6: Sup: 69 (#205); Ego: 10 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#243); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
@8: Sup: 39 (#282); Ego: 1 (#201),
@9: Sup: 49 (#331); Ego: 10 (#211),
Male: #331; Feme: #211
} // #211

#211 as [#5, #80, #10, #40, #5, #10, #50, #1, #10] = epimeno (G1961):
{UMBRA: #59 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to stay at or with, to tarry still,
still to abide, to continue, remain; 1a) of tarrying in a place; 1b) to
persevere, continue; 1b1) of the thing continued in; 1b2) *IN* *THE*
*WORK* *OF* *TEACHING*; 1b3) of the blessing for which one keeps himself
fit; 1b4) denoting the action persisted in;

G3004@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40
(#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211

#211 as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #8] = lego (G3004): {UMBRA: #58
as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to say, to speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b)
to teach; 1c) to exhort, advise, to command, direct; 1d) *TO* *POINT*
*OUT* *WITH* *WORDS*, *INTEND*, *MEAN*, *MEAN* *TO* *SAY*; 1e) to call
by name, to call, name; 1f) to speak out, speak of, mention;

ORIGINAL CONTEXT: “As there being a prerequisite for hypothetical and
conjectural postulate of such cognitive reality which I have desire to
grasp (ie. there may be semantical misapprehensions: MAIS NOUS FAISONS
DE NOTRE MIEUX) is a notion of contingency as a quantum sensibility
within the context of a metaphysical philosophical derivation where
there is a normative absence or a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as
the factuality of being so without being so and which whilst absent of
quantitative certainty yet has a provisional possibility for occurrence
or eventuality.”

H1254@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248

#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] = bara' (H1254): {UMBRA: #0 as #248 %
#41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO*
*SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH* *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*);
1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3) of new conditions
and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created;
1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of something new; 1b4) of
miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to cut down; 1c2) to cut out; 2a) (Hiphil) to
make yourselves fat;

H1696@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 6 (#8); Ego: 4 (#6),
@3: Sup: 8 (#16); Ego: 2 (#8),
@4: Sup: 46 (#62); Ego: 38 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#141); Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #141; Feme: #79
} // #248

#248 as [#2, #4, #2, #200, #600] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #9 as #248 %
#41 = #2} 1) *TO* *SPEAK*, *DECLARE*, *CONVERSE*, promise, warn,
threaten, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
flight;

It seems #CENTRED on a coherent reality and which is epistemologically
compliant with four languages...

How readest thou?"

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1432 HOURS
ON 29 AUGUST 2018: "Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with
your writing, together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.

It's a phrase, not a "METEMPIRICAL WHATSIT", whatever that means.

And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with METEMPIRIC WHATSITS.

And that's just gobbledigook."

DOLF @ 0733 HOURS ON 30 AUGUST 2018: "Such dictum which you advance
concerning the permissibility of variation as to the NATURE of noun,
pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form is conveyed as
acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “KNIT ONE PURL ONE” just
ribbing and the sowing discordant objectives with an impetus of FOUL
declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity worth emulating as
pretence to any principled life: “BE NOT DECEIVED: EVIL COMMUNICATIONS
CORRUPT GOOD MANNERS.

AWAKE TO RIGHTEOUSNESS, AND SIN NOT; FOR SOME HAVE NOT THE KNOWLEDGE OF
GOD: I SPEAK THIS TO YOUR SHAME.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE
MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT ON IMMORTALITY.

SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW
SUM to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage TERNIO as
stems from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}."

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
}

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19 –John 19:22 KJV]

PETER PRINCIPLED (***@PIGBOND.COM) @ 0038 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018:
"Perhaps the usenet server has finally rebelled against your posting of
2000 lines of repetitive tripe fourteen times a day."

REUTERS (ROME) @ 0201 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "CHURCH ROOF IN CENTRAL
ROME COLLAPSES, DAMAGES CHAPEL UNDERNEATH:

The roof of a church built on top of an ancient prison that is said to
have held St. Peter before his crucifixion collapsed on Thursday in Rome
[Reports also by Skynews @ 2159 UTC on 30 AUGUST 2018]. No injuries were
reported.

The church was closed to the public at the time and is normally open
only for marriage ceremonies, but dogs were brought in to sniff through
the rubble to make certain no one had been buried, the fire department said.

The roof collapsed onto the floor of St. Joseph the Carpenter, which was
built in the 1500s on top of the ancient Mamertine prison, where the
defeated Gallic king Vercingetorix and Saints Peter and Paul are said to
have been held.

Wooden beams and terracotta tiles were scattered in piles across the
floor of the church, and one beam crashed through the floor and vaulted
ceiling of a chapel below."

<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-italy-church-roof-collapse/church-roof-in-central-rome-collapses-damages-chapel-underneath-idUSKCN1LF209>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1302 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Careful or Dolf will issue one of his
numerological-legal fatwas against you."

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb
abideth stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which
revealeth the Solar Orb: and He who presideth over the *RED* *ONES*.)

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to
me, which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing
work" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature {#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath
scorched," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of
Horus," is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh
captive, He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who
maketh himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding
Between Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in
presence of the mighty god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over
my limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru;
there will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and
barley, and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley,
and his limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in
the Garden of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come
forth.

O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?

THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS]”
[1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)

— TIME DIDN’T DENY —

“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY ROT.
SOIL SODDEN.

WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”

[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness." [Matthew 23:27 (KJV)]

"Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered."
[Luke 11:52 (KJV)]

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1946 HOURS
ON 30 AUGUST 2018: "Your rationalisation for your errors in writing,
even if it were coherent, is nonsense. Your errors are errors because
there are rules of language and of writing and you are not following
them. Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own
imagination and it does not override the rules of language.

<SNIP gibberish>"

DOLF @ 0009 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE)
USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS* *REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22
(HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS WITHIN CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC
SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF
NAMING CONVENTIONS: [*SEE* *APPENDIX* *FOR* *DETAILS* *OF* *EQUIVALENCE*]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary given for TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term
*BINOME* within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the
patterns of growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A*
*BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1259 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "<SNIP>

By associating the word "binomial" with the word "nomenclature" you make
it obvious that you are using the word "binomial" in its
non-mathematical sense.

I'm not sure what "binomial nomenclature" is supposed to mean, all the
more so because "binomial" is obviously a form of nomenclature, making
the additional word "nomenclature" that you have used completely
redundant if not downright tautological.

By removing the redundancy and de-synonymising what you have written and
separating the phrases, I will attempt to discern what your meaning was:

QUOTE: Such dictum which you advance

TRANSLATION: "What you said"

QUOTE: concerning the permissibility of variation as to the NATURE of
noun, pronoun or adjective

TRANSLATION: "About correct grammatical usage"

QUOTE: by which its grammatical form is conveyed as acceptable binomial
nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl one” just ribbing and the sowing
of discordant bi-conditionals objectives

TRANSLATION: !ERROR! !GIBBERISH DETECTED!"

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

DOLF @ 1418 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "In scientific works, the authority
for a binomial name is usually given, at least when it is first
mentioned, and the date of publication may be specified:

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ..."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
repetition is *one* reason you make no sense."

DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "It was a direct quote from Wikipedia:

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature>

Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal retentive
declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt is no
more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag {ie.
*BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable person}.

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR 2ND NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23} / *ONTIC* VALUE
FOR 2ND NOVICHOK POISONING); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:

Mao Ze Dong

or

Xi Jin Pin

Binomial nomenclature ("two-term naming system") also called binary
nomenclature, is a formal system of naming species of living things by
giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin
grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other
languages. Such a name is called a binomial name (which may be shortened
to just "binomial"), a binomen, binominal name or *A* *SCIENTIFIC*
*NAME*; *MORE* *INFORMALLY* *IT* *IS* *ALSO* *CALLED* *A* *LATIN*
*NAME*. The first part of the name identifies the genus to which the
species belongs; the second part – the specific name or specific epithet
– identifies the species within the genus. For example, humans belong to
the genus Homo and within this genus to the species Homo sapiens.

Tyrannosaurus rex is probably the most widely known binomial.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature>

Thus the provisional proposition is that the evolutionary transition to
a trinomial nomenclature can be as an accommodation of the historicist
oriental / occidental perspectives:

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype:

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DETERMINED
] ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
@9 - Providence of ONTIC necessity as Faculty [#41 x n]

I really don’t have time for any more or your self justifications and
suggest that you better conceptualised your specious retorts with
specificity to the groundwork as the framework of discourse already
published.

That this approach to the quantum of sapient knowledge pragmatics and
data aggregation is then the seminal cause for electronic books which
are as encapsulated knowledge spheres the core logic as building blocks
(vis a vis lego) for artificial intellectual cognitive services."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1952 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Somebody like you probably wrote it. A "binomial" is
a name made of two names. A two-name name is the kind of gibberish you
write.

I'd also like to point you to what the article says: '... is a formal
system of naming species of living things'.

It's biology. Nothing whatsoever to do with Kant or any of your
numerological gibberish."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 1 September 2018

#RAPACIOUS #WORLDVIEWS
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...